Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 523816" data-attributes="member: 2846">The issue I had it was he reported that the Packers decided they were going to get bigger and stronger.  In the end they drafted an OT who is one of the smallest in the league and a DE who some felt was undersized.   Lacy is about the only one who can be said is large for his size, but McGinn said they also decided, the Packers, to not take anyone with an injury risk.   Which Lacy was considered to be.His article after the draft acted like the Packers were somehow forced to go against their game plan of bigger, tougher and more reliable based on the value the picks presented.   Sounded like someone who did not know what was going on and was embarrassed.   At least, that is the way it came across to me.</blockquote>

Total: 321 (members: 2, guests: 319)