Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 523528">If the last 2 drafts, particularly that "all defense" 2012 draft, did not debunk the TT BPA fiction, I don't know what will.The BPA argument is supported mostly in isolated cases, like the Nelson pick, though an argument about need at the position at that time can be made there as well.We can go all the way back to the 2006 draft where we picked Hawk and Hodge in the 1st. and 3rd. rounds.  Was that because they were simply the best players available?  Or did cutting ties with Lennon and Diggs in the off season perhaps dictate those picks?  That was a rhetorical question.If TT chooses not to disclose his thinking for competitive reasons or he finds that it leads to an introvert's exhaustion in answering the endless follow-up questions and thereby finds "BPA" to be a convenient discussion-ender, who could find fault with that?  It worked.  Everybody seemed to take the claim at face value when there was bounteous evidence to the contrary.</blockquote>

Total: 339 (members: 2, guests: 337)