Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Should have called timeout?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adambr2" data-source="post: 597954" data-attributes="member: 7277"><p>I'm not saying you're wrong, as we just don't know for sure what the thought process was there, and you do make a good point in regard to the strategy of the backers. To me your odds if you're New England of being able to drive back down and at least get a FG to tie with 50-55 seconds left, are far greater than somehow anticipating an unlikely playcall within a span of 20-30 seconds and counting on the 1-2% chance that he throws an INT on it.</p><p></p><p>It seems crazy to me if Bellichick was not only counting on that sequence of events but banking his strategy on it rather than rolling the dice with Brady being able to drive back down for a tying or winning drive with a little less than a minute left.</p><p></p><p>He's the best chess player ever if he somehow had :56 - :20 all playing out in his head as the clock was ticking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adambr2, post: 597954, member: 7277"] I'm not saying you're wrong, as we just don't know for sure what the thought process was there, and you do make a good point in regard to the strategy of the backers. To me your odds if you're New England of being able to drive back down and at least get a FG to tie with 50-55 seconds left, are far greater than somehow anticipating an unlikely playcall within a span of 20-30 seconds and counting on the 1-2% chance that he throws an INT on it. It seems crazy to me if Bellichick was not only counting on that sequence of events but banking his strategy on it rather than rolling the dice with Brady being able to drive back down for a tying or winning drive with a little less than a minute left. He's the best chess player ever if he somehow had :56 - :20 all playing out in his head as the clock was ticking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
kf323
Latest posts
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
20 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: El Guapo
36 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: AmishMafia
Today at 9:54 AM
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 9:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
A
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Arodgers12
Today at 8:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Should have called timeout?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top