Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="IPBprez" data-source="post: 8127" data-attributes="member: 51">TD - You might be wrong about that assessment - I'm leaning towards TT viewing this as a talent-oriented approach...  A younger HC.... may be more "fashionable"... but not necessarily what's right for GB.  How many of you were off the deep end with the picks he made during the NFL Draft?  Quite a few, I would gather... eh?  Same thinking goes here....   The Packers may have been behind the curve with Holmgren and his getting the DUAL ROLE of HC and GM - but this time around, I think they're more on-target with "getting the right thing done".Sherman's not exactly another Mooch or Chucky, either.....Personally, I could care less what the latest "trend" might be with a public image on HC's...  The Packers can do whatever they like, as long as it works for us... screw trying to be like other people in this league! The younger guys aren't necessarily winning everything these days, either...  Sherman's problems with winning have always been a lack of focus on Defense preparation and a certain "golfing partner" OC who can't learn from his own mistakes....You watch - if Sherman walks....  Bates gets the call!</blockquote>

Total: 879 (members: 4, guests: 875)