Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Same old crap defense (2021-22 version)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 919947" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>True, Kampman was a good defensive end, no argument there.</p><p></p><p>I guess the point I was trying to make is 4-3 vs. 3-4 is kind of moot. Partially because in the modern NFL, nickel is the defacto base defense. Partially because (technically, anyway) 3-4s should be the better run defense. Partially because a 4-3 under (think the Seahawks base, the Packers under Schurmer) is a 3-4 with 4-3 personnel. Partially because a scheme swap would keep most of our players in similar positions/responsibilities and not fix any deficiencies on the roster.</p><p></p><p>Our OLBs would be come defensive ends and we're still missing a complementary player for Clark in the middle. Our ILBs become a MIKE and WILL and honestly, we kind of have a hole at SAM. Preston could do it, but even he is a little miscast. His greatest use would still be primarily as an EDGE defender. And we don't have a good backup for position. So we haven't fixed any problems and have created a new one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 919947, member: 4199"] True, Kampman was a good defensive end, no argument there. I guess the point I was trying to make is 4-3 vs. 3-4 is kind of moot. Partially because in the modern NFL, nickel is the defacto base defense. Partially because (technically, anyway) 3-4s should be the better run defense. Partially because a 4-3 under (think the Seahawks base, the Packers under Schurmer) is a 3-4 with 4-3 personnel. Partially because a scheme swap would keep most of our players in similar positions/responsibilities and not fix any deficiencies on the roster. Our OLBs would be come defensive ends and we're still missing a complementary player for Clark in the middle. Our ILBs become a MIKE and WILL and honestly, we kind of have a hole at SAM. Preston could do it, but even he is a little miscast. His greatest use would still be primarily as an EDGE defender. And we don't have a good backup for position. So we haven't fixed any problems and have created a new one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
10 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Thirteen Below
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
162-0
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:49 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packers Top 30 Prospect Visits
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:23 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Same old crap defense (2021-22 version)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top