Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 270286" data-attributes="member: 1429">I re-looked at the posts, and did agree with that.I change my statement. It may or may not have been driven by emotions...Thinking better, I find it hard to believe that they were trying to injury him. To hurt him, yeah, but not to injury him.And such accusation should be proved. The Vikings themselves will never make such claim. And I don't believe a professional football player would try to jeopardize intentionally the career of another player...I didn't say they didn't play dirty. I didn't say playing till the refs call it isn't dirty.There's a difference in wanting to hit hard and wanting to injury. A very clear difference to me.They no doubt wanted him to feel pain, but to injury him?I may be talking semantics here, but to me it's not. It's a lot more serious when a player goes for the knee than when a player drives another to the ground.I don't know how to put it exactly. I think both the Cardinals and the Saints were trying to inflict pain in both QBs. I believe they were dirty.But they didn't have the intention to injury both qbs. I don't believe it was to that degree.Their degree of dirtyness is "acceptable", I would say. Or baring it.</blockquote>

Total: 816 (members: 5, guests: 811)