Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rookie Numbers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 908024" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Let's set aside this silly Aaron Rodgers discussion and talk about what actually matters:</p><p></p><p>The potential for awesome or horrible aesthetics depending on the numbers chosen by or for our rookie class. </p><p></p><p><strong>Eric Stokes, CB, #21: </strong>Tooooooo fresh to fail; <strong>10/10</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Josh Myers, OC, #71: </strong>Carrying over from college... I understand. But a center in the 70's is just a little odd. It's good that he's a big-framed center. Won't look as weird; <strong>4/10</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Amari Rodgers, WR, #8: </strong>New school number for a new dynamic in the offense! That is CLEAN!!! <strong>11/10</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Royce Newman, OL, #70: </strong>A respectable number for a guy who is somewhere between being a guard and tackle. We don't know where he belongs; the number doesn't really know either. <strong>7/10</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>Tedarrell Slaton, iDL, #93: </strong>This is a travesty. You got yourself a big ol' hoss who played as heavy as the 360's and you DON'T give him 98 or 99? Not even something in the 70's like they sometimes do with nose tackles??? What are we even doing here?? <strong>2/10</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Shemar Jean-Charles, CB, #22: </strong>You typically see them give slot corners those wonky DB numbers, like 36 or 41, but not my boy Shemar! 22 is nice. <strong>8/10</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Cole Van Lanen, OL, #78: </strong>Look at a picture of Cole and look at his face and tell me he's not born to play with a jersey in the 60's. #78?! What is he, the backup tackle of the freaking Cardinals? Put some respect on the man's name! <strong>2/10</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Isaiah McDuffie, LB, #58: </strong>58 is a number for a big, burly MIKE who eats guard blocks for breakfast. Darting, slashing, lighter linebackers should not wear it. Disapprove. <strong>3/10</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Kylin Hill, RB, #32: </strong>Finally some sanity to round out the list. I dig a number in the 30's for a squatty, burly runner. May he bear the number to as much glory as his predecessor, the great Devante Mays. <strong>7/10</strong></p><p></p><p>Please agree with me or otherwise explain how you're wrong about the way you feel about these numbers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 908024, member: 12283"] Let's set aside this silly Aaron Rodgers discussion and talk about what actually matters: The potential for awesome or horrible aesthetics depending on the numbers chosen by or for our rookie class. [B]Eric Stokes, CB, #21: [/B]Tooooooo fresh to fail; [B]10/10[/B] [B]Josh Myers, OC, #71: [/B]Carrying over from college... I understand. But a center in the 70's is just a little odd. It's good that he's a big-framed center. Won't look as weird; [B]4/10[/B] [B]Amari Rodgers, WR, #8: [/B]New school number for a new dynamic in the offense! That is CLEAN!!! [B]11/10[/B] [B]Royce Newman, OL, #70: [/B]A respectable number for a guy who is somewhere between being a guard and tackle. We don't know where he belongs; the number doesn't really know either. [B]7/10[/B] [B]Tedarrell Slaton, iDL, #93: [/B]This is a travesty. You got yourself a big ol' hoss who played as heavy as the 360's and you DON'T give him 98 or 99? Not even something in the 70's like they sometimes do with nose tackles??? What are we even doing here?? [B]2/10 Shemar Jean-Charles, CB, #22: [/B]You typically see them give slot corners those wonky DB numbers, like 36 or 41, but not my boy Shemar! 22 is nice. [B]8/10 Cole Van Lanen, OL, #78: [/B]Look at a picture of Cole and look at his face and tell me he's not born to play with a jersey in the 60's. #78?! What is he, the backup tackle of the freaking Cardinals? Put some respect on the man's name! [B]2/10 Isaiah McDuffie, LB, #58: [/B]58 is a number for a big, burly MIKE who eats guard blocks for breakfast. Darting, slashing, lighter linebackers should not wear it. Disapprove. [B]3/10 Kylin Hill, RB, #32: [/B]Finally some sanity to round out the list. I dig a number in the 30's for a squatty, burly runner. May he bear the number to as much glory as his predecessor, the great Devante Mays. [B]7/10[/B] Please agree with me or otherwise explain how you're wrong about the way you feel about these numbers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Pkrjones
El Guapo
Latest posts
Free Agency Thread
Latest: gopkrs
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: longtimefan
8 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Roster Status/Tracker
Latest: Sanguine camper
41 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Today at 7:08 PM
Draft Talk
F
Which games next season
Latest: Fordel
Today at 6:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rookie Numbers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top