Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers sack problems II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DILLIGAFF" data-source="post: 257417" data-attributes="member: 1719"><p>I agree with FANOFTHEGAME. When I was siting in the stands for the Monday Night game at the vikings, I could see the whole play develop. That game, with the exception of 2 sacks, A-rod had guys open for short yardage plays and got greedy, thus taking a sack.</p><p> </p><p>This is the only game I can talk about because its the only game I have been too live. At home you just can't see everything like you can in the stands. You are limited by what the camera is shooting.</p><p> </p><p>On a few plays these guys were wide open under neath, who knows how many yards after the catch???</p><p> </p><p>I don't think MM or A-rod put any value in time of possession. They want to make big plays and score early, get the lead and and protect it. Scoring quick in 56 seconds and a good 8 to 9 minute scoring drive is not the same. I would say that scoring 7 Pt's in 8 minutes is twice as good compared to scoring 7 Pt's in 56 seconds. That means the other team has 7 less minutes to match your score.</p><p> </p><p>As good as James Jones touch down (Tampa) reception was, it was quick, leaving plenty of time and opportunity for Tampa to match it.</p><p> </p><p>That system works if you score all the time and don't take sacks, and at the very least if you don't score you can punt the ball pining down the other team at their 20 yard line or less.</p><p> </p><p>Now if you throw in 1 to 2 sacks for big losses and you only run 3 to 5 plays, taking only 2 minutes off the clock, even less if you are throwing incomplete passes. Because of the sack or that penalty you are backed up on your own 17 yard line and punt. Other team has great field position and plenty of time.</p><p> </p><p>Bottom line MM has a vision of how he wants to play a game and continues to force that vision on a team that can not make it happen.</p><p> </p><p>The best thing that could have happened to the Packers would have been to get blown out by the Bengals 40-3. That would have forced MM to go in a different direction. Since last season we have been all so close so many times that MM feels his game plan is still the right one, all we have to do is clean a few things up. </p><p> </p><p>It insanity, If we lose to Dallas, I hope its a 62 pt to 21 pt game with the scores coming from Woodson, Collins, and Harris INTs. That would force some changes, if not we will be stuck with the same game plan we have been playing for 2 years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DILLIGAFF, post: 257417, member: 1719"] I agree with FANOFTHEGAME. When I was siting in the stands for the Monday Night game at the vikings, I could see the whole play develop. That game, with the exception of 2 sacks, A-rod had guys open for short yardage plays and got greedy, thus taking a sack. This is the only game I can talk about because its the only game I have been too live. At home you just can't see everything like you can in the stands. You are limited by what the camera is shooting. On a few plays these guys were wide open under neath, who knows how many yards after the catch??? I don't think MM or A-rod put any value in time of possession. They want to make big plays and score early, get the lead and and protect it. Scoring quick in 56 seconds and a good 8 to 9 minute scoring drive is not the same. I would say that scoring 7 Pt's in 8 minutes is twice as good compared to scoring 7 Pt's in 56 seconds. That means the other team has 7 less minutes to match your score. As good as James Jones touch down (Tampa) reception was, it was quick, leaving plenty of time and opportunity for Tampa to match it. That system works if you score all the time and don't take sacks, and at the very least if you don't score you can punt the ball pining down the other team at their 20 yard line or less. Now if you throw in 1 to 2 sacks for big losses and you only run 3 to 5 plays, taking only 2 minutes off the clock, even less if you are throwing incomplete passes. Because of the sack or that penalty you are backed up on your own 17 yard line and punt. Other team has great field position and plenty of time. Bottom line MM has a vision of how he wants to play a game and continues to force that vision on a team that can not make it happen. The best thing that could have happened to the Packers would have been to get blown out by the Bengals 40-3. That would have forced MM to go in a different direction. Since last season we have been all so close so many times that MM feels his game plan is still the right one, all we have to do is clean a few things up. It insanity, If we lose to Dallas, I hope its a 62 pt to 21 pt game with the scores coming from Woodson, Collins, and Harris INTs. That would force some changes, if not we will be stuck with the same game plan we have been playing for 2 years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
45 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 12:24 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Today at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Today at 10:17 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Today at 8:28 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers sack problems II
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
