Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 257409" data-attributes="member: 1429">The point of the article is that this OL IS the worst in football, and that even if Rodgers is indeed holding onto the ball too much, that doesn't exclude the fact that the sack numbers are what they are MAINLY because of the OL.If they (Rodgers and McCarthy/Clements/Philbin) are or not adapting to having the worst OL in football (given that any adaptiations would overcome us having the worst OL in football), is not adressed.I also think that we should've moved to a more quick timed offense. Which is the coaches fault.But what people are asking is for Rodgers to be better that the other good QBs, having worse conditions. And judging him with that.The perception that if it were another QB in GB, the number of sacks would be acceptable is ludicrous. If it was any other QB in GB, we would still have one of, if not the league worst sack total. And that's what the article proves.</blockquote>

Total: 695 (members: 2, guests: 693)