Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 994688" data-attributes="member: 10086">And GB would be in the same position they were in last January. They’d have 2 QB’s to choose from. It’s not ideal, buts it’s better than NO good QB!The Jets would be in a Win now mode with a substandard QB. If I’m a Jets fan I’d be elated for the chance to have Rodgers and this deal would be done. Id offer two Seconds for a GB #116, plus Aaron. Then if Aaron plays in 2024 and Joe’s postseason, I’d give back a 2025 2nd Rounder.  I’m pretty sure the Packers would take that deal. NY negotiate like it’s New Delhi. I was married for 17 years to a girl born on Long Island, so I know a thing or two about that culture. They love to negotiate it’s just in their DNA. This is fun to them abs they just want to feel like they’ve Won, I respect that.Forget about leverage and all that junk talk. If Aaron Rodgers was already the Jets QB and you were poised to compete on a Championship level in Week 1-2 of season. If Aaron Rodgers went down. Would you trade #42,#43 picks to get him back instantly healthy?Then why in the world wouldn’t you do that here?I'm convinced Rodgers would play if the Packers asked him to but there's absolutely no doubt it would be an awkward situation.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,103 (members: 0, guests: 1,103)