Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 992214" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>Yep. As others have mentioned, GB would have to give their consent to speak with Rodgers in the first place, and from what I can tell it sounds like in most circumstances a team would only do that if they already more or less had some rough framework agreed with the Jets (i.e. if GB and the Jets are miles apart on compensation, they're not gonna go ahead and let them convince Rodgers and hurt GB's bargaining position). But what I haven't seen said much....while it's technically true that Rodgers doesn't have a no-trade clause - at least not one that's formally written into his contract - practically speaking he does have one as he can simply threaten retirement and nix any deal he's not interested in. With that in mind I have to think that the Jets have already received some sort of signal from Rodgers and/or Rodgers' camp that he would be willing to entertain a deal; just like if GB and NYJ were miles apart GB wouldn't consent to allowing NYJ to talk to Rodgers - if Rodgers was absolutely uninterested in joining the Jets he would likely not bother meeting with them in any capacity. </p><p></p><p>All that to say that this meeting (meetings?) suggests to me that we are already at a point where GB and NYJ have at least a rough trade framework agreed to AND Rodgers has signaled to NYJ that he would potentially be interested in joining them. In other words, all three parties have signaled a willingness to get it done, at least in some capacity.</p><p></p><p>I suppose the alternative is that Rodgers isn't at all interested in joining the Jets and is just using them as leverage for reasons unknown but that seems unlikely to me at this point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 992214, member: 17987"] Yep. As others have mentioned, GB would have to give their consent to speak with Rodgers in the first place, and from what I can tell it sounds like in most circumstances a team would only do that if they already more or less had some rough framework agreed with the Jets (i.e. if GB and the Jets are miles apart on compensation, they're not gonna go ahead and let them convince Rodgers and hurt GB's bargaining position). But what I haven't seen said much....while it's technically true that Rodgers doesn't have a no-trade clause - at least not one that's formally written into his contract - practically speaking he does have one as he can simply threaten retirement and nix any deal he's not interested in. With that in mind I have to think that the Jets have already received some sort of signal from Rodgers and/or Rodgers' camp that he would be willing to entertain a deal; just like if GB and NYJ were miles apart GB wouldn't consent to allowing NYJ to talk to Rodgers - if Rodgers was absolutely uninterested in joining the Jets he would likely not bother meeting with them in any capacity. All that to say that this meeting (meetings?) suggests to me that we are already at a point where GB and NYJ have at least a rough trade framework agreed to AND Rodgers has signaled to NYJ that he would potentially be interested in joining them. In other words, all three parties have signaled a willingness to get it done, at least in some capacity. I suppose the alternative is that Rodgers isn't at all interested in joining the Jets and is just using them as leverage for reasons unknown but that seems unlikely to me at this point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
