Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 991511">Do you even care to read those articles you link to? There's absolutely no new information in this one and it doesn't indicate Rodgers having made a decision by now would have made any difference. Actually, I don't need Peter King to tell me that it doesn't make (and never did) a whole lot of sense for the Texans, Colts, Raiders and Panthers to trade for Rodgers as all of them are more than an elite quarterback away from being legit contenders. Especially if they need to give up significant draft capital to acquire him.As I have said all along the Jets are the only team that truly makes sense to be interested in a trade for Rodgers. Unfortunately that might result in the compensation for the Packers to be less than a lot of fans currently expect.My point is that it's completely unrealistic to expect that Rodgers showing up for OTAs would have made a significant difference. As you correctly pointed out, the Packers lacked talent at pass catchers and the quarterback being here for nine days of glorified walkthroughs wouldn't have improved the talent level among the group at all. Yet you feel Klecko's opinion is important enough to share it with the world despite there being no evidence of him actually knowing anyone on the Jets roster or Rodgers <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />I agree with that take. Yet there have only been two former players who have spoken negatively about Rodgers. And I don't put a whole lot of stock into Finley and Jennings.Yet you consider those negative spin of Rodgers as a fact.I'm not upset at all. I truly believe that people need to realize that most articles posted on the web completely lack any credible information and should be considered click-bait first and foremost. Unfortunately most people lack the ability to figure that out.There's no evidence Klecko knows any of the current Jets players nor Rodgers. Therefore I don't see any reason to put more stock into his opinion than anyone else around here for example.You're completely off on that one as well. In my opinion it's a terrible approach to rely on opinions of people who don't have any inside information while completely ignoring the facts. When talking about Rodgers, if the Packers are truly that fed up with him as you believe why did they sign him to an extension last offseason? If there are a ton of players considering him a terrible leader as you suggest why didn't they quit once they fell to 4-8 last season but rallied around him to nearly make the playoffs? You haven't been able to answer any of those questions as it actually indicates the Packers aren't done with him. On top of it, you continue to ignore stories like the one Keisean Nixon told during the season because it doesn't fit your narrative.Well, it helps if you don't post stuff like "It's a fact Rodgers has put himself above the team" in the first place.As I have suggested before, the Packers front office should force Carr to make a decision as well as the Ravens to figure out what they're doing with Lamar moving forward so the front office doesn't have to deal with those factors either.I advocate to not put any stock into anything Steven A. Smith or any other of those talking heads is saying.</blockquote>

Verification

Members online

Total: 1,105 (members: 3, guests: 1,102)

Latest posts

Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
- Latest: DoURant
- Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
- Latest: Pugger
- Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
- Latest: milani
- Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
- Latest: milani
- Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
- Latest: milani
- Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum