Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 991190"><p>The Packers defense gave up an average of 35 points per game in those four NFCCG losses. It's awfully tough winning in the regular season allowing that many points but close to impossible to do it in the playoffs. </p><p></p><p>During the 2014 NFCCG at Seattle the Packers got the ball twice while leading 19-7 with under seven minutes to go but McCarthy decided to run the ball on five of those six plays. Hardly Rodgers fault they weren't able to kill the clock in those situations.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Carr definintely needs to by surrounded by an elite defense to win a Super Bowl. The Raiders unit struggled, finishing 26th in points allowed last season though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Carr is a significant upgrade over Dilfer. He won't be able to carry a team to a Super Bowl either though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You fail to understand that the Packers aren't standing pat while waiting on Rodgers to inform them about their decision. I'm absolutely convinced that they have talked to several teams about possible compensation for him if they want to trade him this offseason. </p><p></p><p>If you need some evidence for that happening just take a look at the Broncos trading for Wilson last year. It's pretty obvious they preferred to acquire Rodgers but once the Packers announced they signed their quarterback to an extension it took them only hours to finalize a deal for Wilson. Do you honestly believe they didn't talk to the Seahawks before the Packers made it clear Rodgers wasn't available? No, they actually had a deal already in place if Rodgers stayed in Green Bay. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's a reasonable take on why the Jets might prefer to sign Carr. Rodgers having already made his decision wouldn't change a single thing about it though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 991190"] The Packers defense gave up an average of 35 points per game in those four NFCCG losses. It's awfully tough winning in the regular season allowing that many points but close to impossible to do it in the playoffs. During the 2014 NFCCG at Seattle the Packers got the ball twice while leading 19-7 with under seven minutes to go but McCarthy decided to run the ball on five of those six plays. Hardly Rodgers fault they weren't able to kill the clock in those situations. Carr definintely needs to by surrounded by an elite defense to win a Super Bowl. The Raiders unit struggled, finishing 26th in points allowed last season though. Carr is a significant upgrade over Dilfer. He won't be able to carry a team to a Super Bowl either though. You fail to understand that the Packers aren't standing pat while waiting on Rodgers to inform them about their decision. I'm absolutely convinced that they have talked to several teams about possible compensation for him if they want to trade him this offseason. If you need some evidence for that happening just take a look at the Broncos trading for Wilson last year. It's pretty obvious they preferred to acquire Rodgers but once the Packers announced they signed their quarterback to an extension it took them only hours to finalize a deal for Wilson. Do you honestly believe they didn't talk to the Seahawks before the Packers made it clear Rodgers wasn't available? No, they actually had a deal already in place if Rodgers stayed in Green Bay. That's a reasonable take on why the Jets might prefer to sign Carr. Rodgers having already made his decision wouldn't change a single thing about it though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
mradtke66
Latest posts
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
20 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:10 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:12 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
