Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 991067"><p>In my opinion if a reporter can't even get the facts correct I don't feel confident in him speculating on other parts.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I honestly don't know what you mean by that. While a team acquiring Rodgers could theoretically not exercise the option I don't see that happening as it would result in a $60 million cap hit for him in 2023. BTW, that wasn't the number Silverstein first used in his article either.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unfortunately none of the reporters that have mentioned the Packers are done with Rodgers have named one of their sources. Not a single one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's a fact that during the 2021 offseason those same reporters that you're quoting now published that the Packers are done with Rodgers and that the quarterback told unanimous sources that he had played his last game for the Packers.</p><p></p><p>Fast forward to now and Rodgers is still on the team's roster and has started every single game since those reports have come out. Yet you still put a ton of stock into those rumors despite them having been proven completely wrong over the past two years. </p><p></p><p>But don't worry, at some point they will be correct about it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just to clarify, I don't believe Jones has been overpaid either.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I highly doubt there's any chance neither Rodgers nor Love are on the roster in 2023.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not going to happen. The Cowboys would take an additional cap hit by trading Prescott on top of having to pay Rodgers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Cowboys have actually played pretty well on offense since McCarthy took over as their head coach. Despite Prescott missing a total of 17 games over the past three seasons they rank third in points scored since 2020.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't consider that a viable option as it would result in the quarterbacks counting at least $42.735 million towards the team's cap in 2024. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually Rodgers could force his way into being on the Packers roster in 2023. There's no way the team can trade him without his approval.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I guarantee Rodgers will inform the Packers of his decision before the start of the new league year.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[USER=7261]@Pokerbrat2000[/USER] for sure puts in a lot of weight in those claims. Otherwise what's the point of posting at least one article per day containing another negative spin on Rodgers?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Did you even care to read the article? Of course it might make more sense for the Jets to sign Carr as they wouldn't have to give up any draft compensation for him, he would most likely be cheaper and he's significantly younger than Rodgers. It has absolutely nothing to do with AR not having informed the Packers of his decision to return for another season.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 991067"] In my opinion if a reporter can't even get the facts correct I don't feel confident in him speculating on other parts. I honestly don't know what you mean by that. While a team acquiring Rodgers could theoretically not exercise the option I don't see that happening as it would result in a $60 million cap hit for him in 2023. BTW, that wasn't the number Silverstein first used in his article either. Unfortunately none of the reporters that have mentioned the Packers are done with Rodgers have named one of their sources. Not a single one. It's a fact that during the 2021 offseason those same reporters that you're quoting now published that the Packers are done with Rodgers and that the quarterback told unanimous sources that he had played his last game for the Packers. Fast forward to now and Rodgers is still on the team's roster and has started every single game since those reports have come out. Yet you still put a ton of stock into those rumors despite them having been proven completely wrong over the past two years. But don't worry, at some point they will be correct about it. Just to clarify, I don't believe Jones has been overpaid either. I highly doubt there's any chance neither Rodgers nor Love are on the roster in 2023. That's not going to happen. The Cowboys would take an additional cap hit by trading Prescott on top of having to pay Rodgers. The Cowboys have actually played pretty well on offense since McCarthy took over as their head coach. Despite Prescott missing a total of 17 games over the past three seasons they rank third in points scored since 2020. I don't consider that a viable option as it would result in the quarterbacks counting at least $42.735 million towards the team's cap in 2024. Actually Rodgers could force his way into being on the Packers roster in 2023. There's no way the team can trade him without his approval. I guarantee Rodgers will inform the Packers of his decision before the start of the new league year. [USER=7261]@Pokerbrat2000[/USER] for sure puts in a lot of weight in those claims. Otherwise what's the point of posting at least one article per day containing another negative spin on Rodgers? Did you even care to read the article? Of course it might make more sense for the Jets to sign Carr as they wouldn't have to give up any draft compensation for him, he would most likely be cheaper and he's significantly younger than Rodgers. It has absolutely nothing to do with AR not having informed the Packers of his decision to return for another season. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
DABIGZ
Magooch
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:10 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
