Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buckthorn" data-source="post: 989982" data-attributes="member: 17954"><p>As far as deals go, this is pretty reasonable and thoughtfully constructed. But (Jets hat on) I'd hate to see the Jets waste time with Rogers (opportunity costs, that's how I see it) when they could put their resources towards a good, hopefully longer-term answer at QB; e.g. Carr, maybe Garropolo...who else is clearly available and worth a look?</p><p></p><p>But I think you're right that the Packers shouldn't expect much more than this in a trade. Unless you're "this close" to a Super Bowl and think Rogers can push you over the goal line, you're overpaying if you offer a first-rounder (or more).</p><p></p><p>And if Rogers does get traded, and it's Love next season, then it sure smells like a rebuild, which may not be much fun to watch for at least a couple of years, if not longer. And people will look back and say (rightfully) that the Packers GMs failed by not surrounding Rogers with enough talent, and largely wasted his carer. Pretty sad, but true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buckthorn, post: 989982, member: 17954"] As far as deals go, this is pretty reasonable and thoughtfully constructed. But (Jets hat on) I'd hate to see the Jets waste time with Rogers (opportunity costs, that's how I see it) when they could put their resources towards a good, hopefully longer-term answer at QB; e.g. Carr, maybe Garropolo...who else is clearly available and worth a look? But I think you're right that the Packers shouldn't expect much more than this in a trade. Unless you're "this close" to a Super Bowl and think Rogers can push you over the goal line, you're overpaying if you offer a first-rounder (or more). And if Rogers does get traded, and it's Love next season, then it sure smells like a rebuild, which may not be much fun to watch for at least a couple of years, if not longer. And people will look back and say (rightfully) that the Packers GMs failed by not surrounding Rogers with enough talent, and largely wasted his carer. Pretty sad, but true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
Poppa San
GreenBaySlacker
Team Ronny
scheeler
Schultz
Big L
gonzozab
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
6 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Posting draft picks
Latest: Poppa San
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Draft-- Media Stuff
Latest: Thirteen Below
10 minutes ago
Draft Talk
G
2024 Salary Cap as related to Free Agency
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
162-0
Latest: weeds
55 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top