Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="buckthorn" data-source="post: 989982" data-attributes="member: 17954">As far as deals go, this is pretty reasonable and thoughtfully constructed. But (Jets hat on) I'd hate to see the Jets waste time with Rogers (opportunity costs, that's how I see it) when they could put their resources towards a good, hopefully longer-term answer at QB; e.g. Carr, maybe Garropolo...who else is clearly available and worth a look?But I think you're right that the Packers shouldn't expect much more than this in a trade. Unless you're "this close" to a Super Bowl and think Rogers can push you over the goal line, you're overpaying if you offer a first-rounder (or more).And if Rogers does get traded, and it's Love next season, then it sure smells like a rebuild, which may not be much fun to watch for at least a couple of years, if not longer. And people will look back and say (rightfully) that the Packers GMs failed by not surrounding Rogers with enough talent, and largely wasted his carer. Pretty sad, but true.</blockquote>

Total: 2,130 (members: 4, guests: 2,126)