Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 989861"><p>The Packers could have traded for A.J. Brown or Tyreek Hill if they really wanted to go all-in. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think the Packers half assed the situation with Love last offseason. But they for sure didn't commit to Rodgers at the time they drafted his successor just to chicken out of it once he performed at an elite level again the following season. </p><p></p><p>As I've mentioned repeatedly, Gutekunst already got it wrong with Rodgers once. He better be right about him this time around.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't have any issue with an elite quarterback not wanting to be part of a rebuild in a season in which he turns 40. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now you're just making up numbers to try to support your claim.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers actually structured his extension in a way to have an out this offseason. Strangely, nobody is complaining about that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm absolutely convinced Rodgers will let the Packers know before the start of the new league year about his decision. That's definitely early enough for them to make proper decision based on it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 989861"] The Packers could have traded for A.J. Brown or Tyreek Hill if they really wanted to go all-in. I don't think the Packers half assed the situation with Love last offseason. But they for sure didn't commit to Rodgers at the time they drafted his successor just to chicken out of it once he performed at an elite level again the following season. As I've mentioned repeatedly, Gutekunst already got it wrong with Rodgers once. He better be right about him this time around. I don't have any issue with an elite quarterback not wanting to be part of a rebuild in a season in which he turns 40. Now you're just making up numbers to try to support your claim. The Packers actually structured his extension in a way to have an out this offseason. Strangely, nobody is complaining about that. I'm absolutely convinced Rodgers will let the Packers know before the start of the new league year about his decision. That's definitely early enough for them to make proper decision based on it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DABIGZ
Latest posts
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Today at 7:33 PM
Draft Talk
S
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: Schultz
Today at 7:27 PM
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Dantés
Today at 7:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: edensmage
Today at 6:50 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top