Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 989790" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>I'm not trying to convince anyone they went all in. Outside of some massive trade to get someone in here, I'm not sure what they could have done at pass catcher more than what they really did. They signed a vet with potential. Another solid vet, drafted a guy they could with as much potential as anyone in the draft and made all those other moves. I guess they should have signed OBJ like so many wanted?</p><p></p><p>My point, he's not half assing it. You can't do everything. They only reason I brought up love is because some think they're playing both scenarios and I think it's pretty clear they've committed to Rodgers while he's here. Cutting Preston, letting Rasul and Campbell walk because they cost money and they want to save cap etc would be playing both sides of the fence and not trying to put a team around Rodgers to win. </p><p></p><p>People can not like the plan, but it wasn't half assed IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 989790, member: 10441"] I'm not trying to convince anyone they went all in. Outside of some massive trade to get someone in here, I'm not sure what they could have done at pass catcher more than what they really did. They signed a vet with potential. Another solid vet, drafted a guy they could with as much potential as anyone in the draft and made all those other moves. I guess they should have signed OBJ like so many wanted? My point, he's not half assing it. You can't do everything. They only reason I brought up love is because some think they're playing both scenarios and I think it's pretty clear they've committed to Rodgers while he's here. Cutting Preston, letting Rasul and Campbell walk because they cost money and they want to save cap etc would be playing both sides of the fence and not trying to put a team around Rodgers to win. People can not like the plan, but it wasn't half assed IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top