Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 989473" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>When did Love become a starting QB? <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>That would be a big leap for a team to assume he is a capable starter, including the Packers, especially since exercising the 5th year is a guaranteed $20M, as well as an immediate cap hit of $20M, unless the restructure before it kicks in.</p><p></p><p>The only way the Packers will exercise that 5th year option is if they are pretty certain that Love IS a starting QB with more talent than just the back QB that has thrown only 83 passes in 3 years. Add to that, they would need a sense that Rodgers is ready to move on this or next year. Otherwise, Love is still a backup and in 2024, one that is being paid $20M to carry a clip board.</p><p></p><p>If another team wants Love via a trade, the Packers don't have to exercise the option, his new team can. Matter of fact, exercising the 5th year option on Love before a trade would be silly. A trade partner might view it as overcompensation, that they are now stuck with, for an unproven QB. Thus, the Packers probably wouldn't get squat for him in a trade. Think about this, the Giants passed on the 5th year option for quarterback <a href="https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/daniel-jones" target="_blank"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">Daniel Jones</span></a> ($22.4 M).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 989473, member: 7261"] When did Love become a starting QB? ;) That would be a big leap for a team to assume he is a capable starter, including the Packers, especially since exercising the 5th year is a guaranteed $20M, as well as an immediate cap hit of $20M, unless the restructure before it kicks in. The only way the Packers will exercise that 5th year option is if they are pretty certain that Love IS a starting QB with more talent than just the back QB that has thrown only 83 passes in 3 years. Add to that, they would need a sense that Rodgers is ready to move on this or next year. Otherwise, Love is still a backup and in 2024, one that is being paid $20M to carry a clip board. If another team wants Love via a trade, the Packers don't have to exercise the option, his new team can. Matter of fact, exercising the 5th year option on Love before a trade would be silly. A trade partner might view it as overcompensation, that they are now stuck with, for an unproven QB. Thus, the Packers probably wouldn't get squat for him in a trade. Think about this, the Giants passed on the 5th year option for quarterback [URL='https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/daniel-jones'][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]Daniel Jones[/COLOR][/URL] ($22.4 M). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
shockerx
Latest posts
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
15 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: tynimiller
34 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
162-0
Latest: weeds
Today at 5:47 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 2:18 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top