Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rmontro" data-source="post: 911211" data-attributes="member: 12340"><p>I'm not a GM, but if I was I would have had a conversation with Rodgers about how long he planned on playing, and go from there. I can't say exactly when I would draft his replacement, but I thought picking Love felt premature. </p><p></p><p>Honestly, I would be more concerned about equipping the HOF quarterback with the best team around him while he's here, and pick up the pieces later. Maybe we'll flounder for a few years and get some high draft picks, but at least I would have given it all while the window was open. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Last year might have been a fluke. Fluke is probably not the right word, because Rodgers is damn good, even in his down years. But maybe his staying healthy last year was an outlier, and not an indication of things to come. That's why I say if they really think Love is the guy, Rodgers trade value is never going to be higher than it is right now.</p><p></p><p>Having said all that, my gut feeling is that Rodgers stays our quarterback. And I really think deep down, that is what he wants. He just wants some issues addressed and his ego massaged. Keeping him may even be a mistake, we'll just have to see what unfolds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rmontro, post: 911211, member: 12340"] I'm not a GM, but if I was I would have had a conversation with Rodgers about how long he planned on playing, and go from there. I can't say exactly when I would draft his replacement, but I thought picking Love felt premature. Honestly, I would be more concerned about equipping the HOF quarterback with the best team around him while he's here, and pick up the pieces later. Maybe we'll flounder for a few years and get some high draft picks, but at least I would have given it all while the window was open. Last year might have been a fluke. Fluke is probably not the right word, because Rodgers is damn good, even in his down years. But maybe his staying healthy last year was an outlier, and not an indication of things to come. That's why I say if they really think Love is the guy, Rodgers trade value is never going to be higher than it is right now. Having said all that, my gut feeling is that Rodgers stays our quarterback. And I really think deep down, that is what he wants. He just wants some issues addressed and his ego massaged. Keeping him may even be a mistake, we'll just have to see what unfolds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
sschind
mradtke66
Latest posts
S
Update on Watson's Hamstrngs
Latest: sschind
10 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
OTAs
Latest: sschind
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Shareholders meeting 2024?
Latest: Cheese Meister
57 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 2:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fire Aaron Hill !!!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Thursday at 1:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Rodgers reportedly disgruntled, does not want to return to the Packers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top