Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers' Leadership Called Into Question Again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 487521" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I'll bet that's closer to the truth - he takes sacks because he wants to give his receivers a chance to make a big play and because he realizes that a sack is far superior to an INT. And those of us who criticize him for holding onto the ball too long have to recognize the number of times his doing so results in a first down or TD.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">It also needs to be said that the main reason Rodgers is sacked a lot - over the last couple of seasons at least - is because he directs a pass first offense and his "pass protectors" (not just the OL) aren't very good. Also, McGinn (who I believe gets these numbers from the Packers) has Rodgers being responsible for 14 of the teams 55 sacks in 18 games. Like many of you, I think that's too many but it shouldn't be overstated. </span></p><p> </p><p><em><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">But no worries about this for next season: I think McCarthy has come up with the cure:</span></em></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p><u><span style="color: #008000"><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><a href="http://if" target="_blank">http://if</a> youbelievethisisarealquoteIhaveabridgeforsale.com</span></span></u></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 487521, member: 4300"] [FONT=Tahoma]I'll bet that's closer to the truth - he takes sacks because he wants to give his receivers a chance to make a big play and because he realizes that a sack is far superior to an INT. And those of us who criticize him for holding onto the ball too long have to recognize the number of times his doing so results in a first down or TD.[/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]It also needs to be said that the main reason Rodgers is sacked a lot - over the last couple of seasons at least - is because he directs a pass first offense and his "pass protectors" (not just the OL) aren't very good. Also, McGinn (who I believe gets these numbers from the Packers) has Rodgers being responsible for 14 of the teams 55 sacks in 18 games. Like many of you, I think that's too many but it shouldn't be overstated. [/FONT] [I][FONT=Tahoma]But no worries about this for next season: I think McCarthy has come up with the cure:[/FONT][/I] [FONT=Georgia][/FONT] [U][COLOR=#008000][FONT=Georgia][url]http://if[/url] youbelievethisisarealquoteIhaveabridgeforsale.com[/FONT][/COLOR][/U] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
20 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers' Leadership Called Into Question Again
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top