Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers' Leadership Called Into Question Again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackPackPackers" data-source="post: 487440" data-attributes="member: 3529"><p>Lol, when was it assumed that I didn't support Thompson and McCarthy? I never wrote that in any of my posts. There must have been a huge misunderstanding. TT and MM did a solid job of creating an above average tam. Congrats to them, however, that still does not cover up the big flaws this current Packers team has.</p><p> </p><p>FIRSTLY, I have never bought into the idea that Favre was bigger than the franchise. In my opinion, Favre DID build the franchise where it is today. If Favre never existed, then the Packers probably would have still been a small market team like the Jacksonville Jaguars.</p><p> </p><p>SECONDLY, people are so afraid to criticize Rodgers because he is the face of the franchise. Most Packer fans are so blind to see any wrong in Aaron Rodgers. He is treated like a king, which is a really annoying, because he is just like any Packer player. He makes BIG mistakes that people seem to not question his skill. Seriously, I hope Rodgers understands that he will NOT make another SB run until the offensive line gets fixed. Favre had to deal with this pretty much during the entire early/mid 2000s. For Favre having a bad offensive line, it meant to him by taking huge risks that usually resulted into throwing interceptions. For Rodgers having a bad offensive line, it meant to him by taking NO risk that usually resulted in lots sacks/fumbles/killing drives. I hate to say this, but an interception and punting back to another team is essentially the same thing. The opposite team will get an extra possession.</p><p> </p><p>Aaron Rodgers MUST take more chances during pivotal games. There will always be high risk, but the rewards are greater if its successful. This is what made Brett Favre a great player because he made near dead end plays to successful plays due to his unwillingness to take the sack.</p><p> </p><p>Also, it seems that Aaron Rodgers doesn't want to mess up his "clean" stats/QBR rating/INT rate so he automatically defaults into taking the sack since he doesn't see anything open. Maybe he loves the praise by all the media journalists and ESPN of how good he is at protecting the ball...seriously Aaron? It's a team sport...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackPackPackers, post: 487440, member: 3529"] Lol, when was it assumed that I didn't support Thompson and McCarthy? I never wrote that in any of my posts. There must have been a huge misunderstanding. TT and MM did a solid job of creating an above average tam. Congrats to them, however, that still does not cover up the big flaws this current Packers team has. FIRSTLY, I have never bought into the idea that Favre was bigger than the franchise. In my opinion, Favre DID build the franchise where it is today. If Favre never existed, then the Packers probably would have still been a small market team like the Jacksonville Jaguars. SECONDLY, people are so afraid to criticize Rodgers because he is the face of the franchise. Most Packer fans are so blind to see any wrong in Aaron Rodgers. He is treated like a king, which is a really annoying, because he is just like any Packer player. He makes BIG mistakes that people seem to not question his skill. Seriously, I hope Rodgers understands that he will NOT make another SB run until the offensive line gets fixed. Favre had to deal with this pretty much during the entire early/mid 2000s. For Favre having a bad offensive line, it meant to him by taking huge risks that usually resulted into throwing interceptions. For Rodgers having a bad offensive line, it meant to him by taking NO risk that usually resulted in lots sacks/fumbles/killing drives. I hate to say this, but an interception and punting back to another team is essentially the same thing. The opposite team will get an extra possession. Aaron Rodgers MUST take more chances during pivotal games. There will always be high risk, but the rewards are greater if its successful. This is what made Brett Favre a great player because he made near dead end plays to successful plays due to his unwillingness to take the sack. Also, it seems that Aaron Rodgers doesn't want to mess up his "clean" stats/QBR rating/INT rate so he automatically defaults into taking the sack since he doesn't see anything open. Maybe he loves the praise by all the media journalists and ESPN of how good he is at protecting the ball...seriously Aaron? It's a team sport... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
rmontro
thequick12
Heyjoe4
Catamount1971
Latest posts
H
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Heyjoe4
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: milani
Today at 5:28 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: longtimefan
Yesterday at 11:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Draft Review
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:00 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers' Leadership Called Into Question Again
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top