Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kitten" data-source="post: 391020" data-attributes="member: 2692">I think we should consider these theories, even if they seem unlikely and unprovable. I've noticed something, I'm going to draw up a Favre/ Rodgers comparison. Granted this is all hearsay and not even circumstantial evidence, but give it a consideration. Favre did have an unusually high percentage of INTs. So much that he was pretty much notorious for them. All QBs will have INTs at some point, it's part of the game, no matter how good you are.Rodgers seems focused and driven when he is playing. Stone cold. He seems to think with his head.Favre always seemed to me to be a bit unpredictable. Like he was all over the place. I'm not saying Favre wasn't a great QB, that would be a false statement on my part, I'm just saying he was unreliable. Inconsistent. IF he was on pills of any kind, not saying he was, but we are entertaining a theory, this would contribute to his lack of focus, the INTs for sure as well as his lack of seriousness for the game.I emphasize there is no proof anywhere that he was playing under the influence of anything. I just think we should take Forget Favre's theories into consideration as we have with theories much more abstract than these.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 667 (members: 1, guests: 666)