Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dhazer" data-source="post: 237150" data-attributes="member: 783"></blockquote>I have no clue why you laugh about the bears because if you look back to the 2004 season we are a whopping 2-6 so don&#039;t be laughing to hard Lovie has our number.Sun 19-Sep-2004&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Chicago Bears&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 10&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 21&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; L&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; H&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Reg&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 70,688&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Mike ShermanSun 02-Jan-2005&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Chicago Bears&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 31&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 14&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; W&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; A&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Reg&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 62,197&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Mike Sherman&nbsp;Sun 04-Dec-2005&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Chicago Bears&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 7&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 19&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; L&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; A&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Reg&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 62,177&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Mike ShermanSun 25-Dec-2005&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Chicago Bears&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 17&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 24&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; L&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; H&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Reg&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 69,757&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Mike Sherman&nbsp;Sun 10-Sep-2006&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Chicago Bears&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 0&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 26&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; L&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; H&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Reg&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 70,918&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Mike McCarthySun 31-Dec-2006&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Chicago Bears&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 26&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 7&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; W&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; A&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Reg&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 62,287&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Mike McCarthy&nbsp;Sun 07-Oct-2007&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Chicago Bears&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 20&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 27&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; L&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; H&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Reg&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 70,904&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Mike McCarthySun 23-Dec-2007&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Chicago Bears&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 7&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 35&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; L&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; A&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Reg&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 62,272&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Mike McCarthyAs far as worrying if Rodgers can hold onto the ball, lets just hope he stays healthy the next game.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="dhazer, post: 237150, member: 783"] [b][/b][/quote] I have no clue why you laugh about the bears because if you look back to the 2004 season we are a whopping 2-6 so don't be laughing to hard Lovie has our number. Sun 19-Sep-2004 Chicago Bears 10 21 L H Reg 70,688 Mike Sherman Sun 02-Jan-2005 Chicago Bears 31 14 W A Reg 62,197 Mike Sherman Sun 04-Dec-2005 Chicago Bears 7 19 L A Reg 62,177 Mike Sherman Sun 25-Dec-2005 Chicago Bears 17 24 L H Reg 69,757 Mike Sherman Sun 10-Sep-2006 Chicago Bears 0 26 L H Reg 70,918 Mike McCarthy Sun 31-Dec-2006 Chicago Bears 26 7 W A Reg 62,287 Mike McCarthy Sun 07-Oct-2007 Chicago Bears 20 27 L H Reg 70,904 Mike McCarthy Sun 23-Dec-2007 Chicago Bears 7 35 L A Reg 62,272 Mike McCarthy As far as worrying if Rodgers can hold onto the ball, lets just hope he stays healthy the next game. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Reply to thread

Members online

Latest posts