Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 964239" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>I don't need to rewatch either game to know that the losses weren't solely due to missing Bahk.  Are the Packers a better team with a healthy Bahk?  Of course they are, but they have lost with him and without him playing. I'll say what I said back when they gave him a huge new contract.  It is a ton of money to tie up in one player, a player that while the best in the league at the time, reduces your financial ability to improve the team elsewhere.  I hope he makes it back to start this season, but if he doesn't, I expect the Packers to still be a very competitive team without him.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 1,015 (members: 0, guests: 1,015)