Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Retired Numbers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NDPackerFan" data-source="post: 19922" data-attributes="member: 193"><p>I think I understand Slick and somewhat agree. Why not put the name in the bowl of Lambeau Field with the number but allow it to be worn still? Look at the New York Yankees, for example, they have so many numbers retired now, that new players coming in take weird numbers. Only single #'s left with the Yanks are 2 or 6. </p><p></p><p>Number Player Retired </p><p>1 Billy Martin August 10, 1986 </p><p>3 Babe Ruth June 13, 1948 </p><p>4 Lou Gehrig July 4, 1939 </p><p>5 Joe DiMaggio 1952 </p><p>7 Mickey Mantle June 8, 1969 </p><p>8 Bill ****ey 1972 </p><p>8 Yogi Berra 1972 </p><p>9 Roger Maris July 21, 1984 </p><p>10 Phil Rizzuto August 4, 1985 * </p><p>15 Thurman Munson 1979 </p><p>16 Whitey Ford 1974 </p><p>23 Don Mattingly August 31, 1997 * </p><p>32 Elston Howard July 21, 1984 </p><p>37 Casey Stengel 1970 </p><p>42 Jackie Robinson April 15, 1997 # </p><p>44 Reggie Jackson August 14, 1993 * </p><p>49 Ron Guidry August 23, 2003 </p><p></p><p>Anyway, probably a bad argument as well, but I guess it's my only rationale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NDPackerFan, post: 19922, member: 193"] I think I understand Slick and somewhat agree. Why not put the name in the bowl of Lambeau Field with the number but allow it to be worn still? Look at the New York Yankees, for example, they have so many numbers retired now, that new players coming in take weird numbers. Only single #'s left with the Yanks are 2 or 6. Number Player Retired 1 Billy Martin August 10, 1986 3 Babe Ruth June 13, 1948 4 Lou Gehrig July 4, 1939 5 Joe DiMaggio 1952 7 Mickey Mantle June 8, 1969 8 Bill ****ey 1972 8 Yogi Berra 1972 9 Roger Maris July 21, 1984 10 Phil Rizzuto August 4, 1985 * 15 Thurman Munson 1979 16 Whitey Ford 1974 23 Don Mattingly August 31, 1997 * 32 Elston Howard July 21, 1984 37 Casey Stengel 1970 42 Jackie Robinson April 15, 1997 # 44 Reggie Jackson August 14, 1993 * 49 Ron Guidry August 23, 2003 Anyway, probably a bad argument as well, but I guess it's my only rationale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
GreenBaySlacker
Pkrjones
Latest posts
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 9:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Retired Numbers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top