Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Report: packers considering tagging Jennings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 490634" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #000000">● I brought up the Flynn situation regarding fans expectations of his worth in the league - some Packers fans were thinking he was worth a first rounder and that obviously turned out not to be true. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #000000">● We really don't know how seriously the Packers are considering tagging Jennings. Perhaps they leaked that so Jennings would feel better about the Packers and if he's disappointed by the offers he gets in UFA he may be more likely to come back to Green Bay. But that's just wild *** speculation, my point is (luckily) we don't know what's really going on at 1265. One report that's been linked on this forum says Jennings is looking for $13M-$14M/year. If true, YIKES and good luck. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #000000">● I agree if they tag and keep Jennings they "have" to get rid of Finley. I think the difference between the two is twofold: First, the players behind each - Jennings is much more "replaceable". Second, Finley is going turn 26 on March 26 (I believe that's about the same time his $3M roster bonus is due, so if we don't know before then…). Jennings will be thirty in September. But I think the first point is more important.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #000000">● It does appear Brady gave the Pats a home town discount, but I haven't seen the details so I'm not positive. (I remember when Favre would accept more money upfront to help the cap many Packers fans misinterpreted that as him helping the Packers to his own financial detriment, which wasn't the case. BTW, I blame Favre for a lot but not that.) Back to Brady: I heard on the radio this morning that Brady is probably the only NFL starting QB who is the second "earner" in his marriage. Last year he and his wife allegedly made about $76M, the majority of that earned by his model-wife. Good for him for not demanding as much as he could but if any player could afford it…</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #000000">● Swansta3, as mentioned elsewhere, Thompson did tag and trade Corey Williams. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 490634, member: 4300"] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]● I brought up the Flynn situation regarding fans expectations of his worth in the league - some Packers fans were thinking he was worth a first rounder and that obviously turned out not to be true. [/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]● We really don't know how seriously the Packers are considering tagging Jennings. Perhaps they leaked that so Jennings would feel better about the Packers and if he's disappointed by the offers he gets in UFA he may be more likely to come back to Green Bay. But that's just wild *** speculation, my point is (luckily) we don't know what's really going on at 1265. One report that's been linked on this forum says Jennings is looking for $13M-$14M/year. If true, YIKES and good luck. [/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]● I agree if they tag and keep Jennings they "have" to get rid of Finley. I think the difference between the two is twofold: First, the players behind each - Jennings is much more "replaceable". Second, Finley is going turn 26 on March 26 (I believe that's about the same time his $3M roster bonus is due, so if we don't know before then…). Jennings will be thirty in September. But I think the first point is more important.[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]● It does appear Brady gave the Pats a home town discount, but I haven't seen the details so I'm not positive. (I remember when Favre would accept more money upfront to help the cap many Packers fans misinterpreted that as him helping the Packers to his own financial detriment, which wasn't the case. BTW, I blame Favre for a lot but not that.) Back to Brady: I heard on the radio this morning that Brady is probably the only NFL starting QB who is the second "earner" in his marriage. Last year he and his wife allegedly made about $76M, the majority of that earned by his model-wife. Good for him for not demanding as much as he could but if any player could afford it…[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]● Swansta3, as mentioned elsewhere, Thompson did tag and trade Corey Williams. [/COLOR][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Latest posts
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: gopkrs
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
10 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
58 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
Today at 12:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Report: packers considering tagging Jennings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top