Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Report: Aaron Rodgers return to Packers hinges on a trade for Randall Cobb
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 916241" data-attributes="member: 13032"><p>125/70 is just too much, as much as I like Adams and appreciate his skill set. Even if he is the best WR in the NFL, and he probably is right now, especially with #12 throwing to him, that kind of deal can cripple a franchise financially and competitively. </p><p></p><p>And if Rodgers leaves, which seems likely, what good is it to have the best WR if the QB can't get the ball near him? </p><p></p><p>We're already seeing $45 mil/year for QBs (Mahomes). How is a franchise supposed to build around that consistently? I know the Chiefs are pulling it off, but for how long? I'd rather see a competitive team every year that makes the occasional deep run. And realistically, that's probably all we can ask for post-Rodgers.</p><p></p><p>So I'd say no to Adams and work on getting the D into the top 5. They aren't that far and plenty of teams have won with an elite D - Bucs, Seahags, Ravens, Steelers. I'm probably missing a few.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heyjoe4, post: 916241, member: 13032"] 125/70 is just too much, as much as I like Adams and appreciate his skill set. Even if he is the best WR in the NFL, and he probably is right now, especially with #12 throwing to him, that kind of deal can cripple a franchise financially and competitively. And if Rodgers leaves, which seems likely, what good is it to have the best WR if the QB can't get the ball near him? We're already seeing $45 mil/year for QBs (Mahomes). How is a franchise supposed to build around that consistently? I know the Chiefs are pulling it off, but for how long? I'd rather see a competitive team every year that makes the occasional deep run. And realistically, that's probably all we can ask for post-Rodgers. So I'd say no to Adams and work on getting the D into the top 5. They aren't that far and plenty of teams have won with an elite D - Bucs, Seahags, Ravens, Steelers. I'm probably missing a few. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
weeds
Latest posts
H
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: Heyjoe4
19 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: AmishMafia
20 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
44 minutes ago
Draft Talk
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:27 PM
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 7:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Report: Aaron Rodgers return to Packers hinges on a trade for Randall Cobb
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top