Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Reggie Begelton Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 877404" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>He really hurt himself year 2 with a 46% catch rate. Granted he does get some long shots which doesn't help that %. I could see #5.</p><p></p><p> I think either one of EQ or Begelton could beat him out and he’s very lucky we didn’t draft a speed WR early. I realize this is a Begelton thread, but EQ is probably the most overlooked potential between the two options.</p><p>His 10 yard split was at 89% for his WR grouping and 94%tile for his size. As a comparison he has a 1.54X10yd which is the same as Denzel Mims, yet he’s 2 inches taller 6.475” and 10 pounds heavier than Mims 6.20”. EQ also put up 20 reps so he’s no slouch strength wise. He had great athletic measurements coming into the league and Lance Zerlein had him projected 3-4 round. EQ probably had the best long term projection coming out of college of any current Packer WR prospect aside from Funchess or Adams. He’s also been very solid and disruptive on ST coverage.</p><p></p><p>As far as what Begelton brings to the table is he has ideal size and hands for a Slot option and he’s very aggressive on ST.</p><p></p><p>MVS has got his back against the WR wall. He’ll likely make the cut because of his Raw Speed and another year in the MLF system to his advantage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 877404, member: 10086"] He really hurt himself year 2 with a 46% catch rate. Granted he does get some long shots which doesn't help that %. I could see #5. I think either one of EQ or Begelton could beat him out and he’s very lucky we didn’t draft a speed WR early. I realize this is a Begelton thread, but EQ is probably the most overlooked potential between the two options. His 10 yard split was at 89% for his WR grouping and 94%tile for his size. As a comparison he has a 1.54X10yd which is the same as Denzel Mims, yet he’s 2 inches taller 6.475” and 10 pounds heavier than Mims 6.20”. EQ also put up 20 reps so he’s no slouch strength wise. He had great athletic measurements coming into the league and Lance Zerlein had him projected 3-4 round. EQ probably had the best long term projection coming out of college of any current Packer WR prospect aside from Funchess or Adams. He’s also been very solid and disruptive on ST coverage. As far as what Begelton brings to the table is he has ideal size and hands for a Slot option and he’s very aggressive on ST. MVS has got his back against the WR wall. He’ll likely make the cut because of his Raw Speed and another year in the MLF system to his advantage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Today at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Today at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Today at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Reggie Begelton Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top