Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Recipe For Winning Is . . .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 469946"><p>Right. Correlation does not necessarily equate to causation. You mentioned the "if you're winning" scenario. On the flip side, if you're losing and forced to throw the ball in the second half, run frequency goes down. Further, the opposition expects the pass in that situation, plays a lot of nickel and dime, and the passing efficiency tends to go down.</p><p> </p><p>I agree that MM's play calling is head scratching at times; it's like he's spell bound by his game plan. You'd figure after Rodgers got sacked for the 4th. time in that Seattle game, he'd give up on 4 and 5 wide with an empty backfield. Of course not. Let's continue to signal 100% pass with minimum protection to prove the game plan correct in defiance of all the evidence. When things are not working, he's slow to move to Plan B...not until halftime. Conversely, when he ran a pass play out of a two tight end front against Houston, I nearly fell out of my chair. Where has that been all season?</p><p> </p><p>I'll bet the average engaged fan can watch them line up and guess pass/run correctly 80% of the time.</p><p> </p><p>This not to say I consider our current running game sufficient. It is not, and I've said before it will cost us. However, we don't need a Gore or a McCoy to make this offense run. Just something a bit better than we've got...15 carries for 60 yards in a healthy James Starks kind of way ought to be enough. Or Benson was that guy.</p><p> </p><p>But what are you gonna do until you get to the next draft/FA period. Make lemonade out of lemons, and the D has pick up some of the slack. Maybe Starks can get back in gear and add some punch.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 469946"] Right. Correlation does not necessarily equate to causation. You mentioned the "if you're winning" scenario. On the flip side, if you're losing and forced to throw the ball in the second half, run frequency goes down. Further, the opposition expects the pass in that situation, plays a lot of nickel and dime, and the passing efficiency tends to go down. I agree that MM's play calling is head scratching at times; it's like he's spell bound by his game plan. You'd figure after Rodgers got sacked for the 4th. time in that Seattle game, he'd give up on 4 and 5 wide with an empty backfield. Of course not. Let's continue to signal 100% pass with minimum protection to prove the game plan correct in defiance of all the evidence. When things are not working, he's slow to move to Plan B...not until halftime. Conversely, when he ran a pass play out of a two tight end front against Houston, I nearly fell out of my chair. Where has that been all season? I'll bet the average engaged fan can watch them line up and guess pass/run correctly 80% of the time. This not to say I consider our current running game sufficient. It is not, and I've said before it will cost us. However, we don't need a Gore or a McCoy to make this offense run. Just something a bit better than we've got...15 carries for 60 yards in a healthy James Starks kind of way ought to be enough. Or Benson was that guy. But what are you gonna do until you get to the next draft/FA period. Make lemonade out of lemons, and the D has pick up some of the slack. Maybe Starks can get back in gear and add some punch. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Dukefan12
Heyjoe4
sschind
Half Empty
Latest posts
H
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Heyjoe4
11 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 Round 4, pick 111: Evan Williams, S, Oregon
Latest: Half Empty
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Amish 57th Annual Draft Contest - by proxy
Latest: PikeBadger
30 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: PikeBadger
36 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Moving Up
Latest: PikeBadger
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Recipe For Winning Is . . .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top