Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Recipe For Winning Is . . .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 469921"><p>We run best in hurry up when we trap nickel defenses on the field.</p><p> </p><p>You do need to strip Rodgers stats out of the run game to determine run frequency...he ain't RGIII or Newton who have called run plays.</p><p> </p><p>Average yards per carry can distort the picture. Long runs, which are not necessary for success, jack the stat. For example, Green is at 3.8. Take out the 41 yard run (in a losing effort to boot), and you're down to 2.6.</p><p> </p><p>You do have to run the ball effectively, but how do you define it?</p><p> </p><p>In this offense, you have to run the ball often enough and well enough to keep the pass rush from teeing off. Seattle racked up 8 sacks in the first half when we showed no inclination to run. We weren't even passing out of run formations to try to keep them honest. Then we come out in the second half running Benson 6 times for 31 yards in the first 10 plays. Voila! No sacks in the second half.</p><p> </p><p>The rushing baseline for winning is (1) short yardage success, (2) red zone success, (3) burning clock in the 4th. quarter with the lead. Beyond that, running for 3 yards on first down is a win.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 469921"] We run best in hurry up when we trap nickel defenses on the field. You do need to strip Rodgers stats out of the run game to determine run frequency...he ain't RGIII or Newton who have called run plays. Average yards per carry can distort the picture. Long runs, which are not necessary for success, jack the stat. For example, Green is at 3.8. Take out the 41 yard run (in a losing effort to boot), and you're down to 2.6. You do have to run the ball effectively, but how do you define it? In this offense, you have to run the ball often enough and well enough to keep the pass rush from teeing off. Seattle racked up 8 sacks in the first half when we showed no inclination to run. We weren't even passing out of run formations to try to keep them honest. Then we come out in the second half running Benson 6 times for 31 yards in the first 10 plays. Voila! No sacks in the second half. The rushing baseline for winning is (1) short yardage success, (2) red zone success, (3) burning clock in the 4th. quarter with the lead. Beyond that, running for 3 yards on first down is a win. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
CarryTheG14
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
36 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:10 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:09 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Recipe For Winning Is . . .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top