Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Raptorman" data-source="post: 246570" data-attributes="member: 655">So let’s take a look at MN and GB WR’s and TE’s.  Green Bay TE’s: 59 Rec. 539 yards 9.6 yards a catch. 6 TD’s, 1 TD per 9.3 receptionsMinnesota TE’s: 53 Rec. 753 yards, 14.2 yards a catch. 7 TD’s. 1 TD per 7.6 receptions.  Green Bay WR’s: 278 Rec. 3632 yards, 13.1 yards a catch. 24 TD’s. 1 TD per 11.6 receptionsMinnesota WR’s: 172 Rec. 2528 yards, 14.7 yards a catch. 20 TD’s. 1 TD per 8.6 receptions.  Now I am not going to sit here and say Green Bay’s receivers are not any good because they are. They catch a lot of balls because they are thrown a lot of balls. But if you break it down to a per reception basis they don’t appear to be head and shoulders above the Vikings receivers. Percy Harvin is an unknown at this point and anyone who says he will be good, or bad, is a fool. Troy “stone hands” Williamson was supposed to be good. We all know how that turned out. Of course MN doesn’t have a QB to throw the ball to these guys so I am sure that they will be undervalued and under appreciated by most.  Sorry for not mindlessly ranting about how good Harvin is going to be. I just don’t know how good he will be. </blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 631 (members: 0, guests: 631)