Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 849955" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>I'm still on WR. </p><p></p><p>They aren't benching Martinez. I just can't envision it. And of the possible options out there to play next to him, I don't see many that would help more than simply getting Raven Greene back. I also think that some of the more attractive linebacker targets would be making a much more significant scheme shift to come to Green Bay.</p><p></p><p>The need at WR is every bit as big to me, especially when you consider playing great man cover teams. And I see some potential options out there who would be able to transition fairly smoothly because of schematic similarities. I also think it's easier to bring a WR in and say "run these routes in these packages" and have them contribute, as opposed to bringing in a LB and saying "learn the defense."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 849955, member: 12283"] I'm still on WR. They aren't benching Martinez. I just can't envision it. And of the possible options out there to play next to him, I don't see many that would help more than simply getting Raven Greene back. I also think that some of the more attractive linebacker targets would be making a much more significant scheme shift to come to Green Bay. The need at WR is every bit as big to me, especially when you consider playing great man cover teams. And I see some potential options out there who would be able to transition fairly smoothly because of schematic similarities. I also think it's easier to bring a WR in and say "run these routes in these packages" and have them contribute, as opposed to bringing in a LB and saying "learn the defense." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top