Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 849942" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>To follow up on the Robert Woods idea:</p><p></p><p>The Rams need to recoup some draft capital after trading so much away in the Ramsey deal, among other transactions. They also need to create some cap room, as they will be giving Ramsey a mega contract. Specifically at WR, they've paid Cooks and will certainly want to pay Kupp. Carrying three big veteran contracts at that position at the same time would be a challenge. Josh Reynolds is a pretty solid WR who would likely be able to replace Woods in 11 personnel. And lastly, Everett has begun to emerge as more of a receiving option at tight end.</p><p></p><p>So for all of those reason, I could imagine a willingness on their part to deal Robert Woods. Woods is 27 and has two more years remaining on his deal (basically 9M cap hits for both seasons). He would be a nice fit as a man coverage beater. He can play in the slot, though Kupp has obviously dominated the work there in LA. </p><p></p><p>If they would take a 3rd for him, I do that without question. Or maybe a 3rd and a player (Josh Jackson?). A 2nd would be a harder call, though it wouldn't be surprising at all if that's what they demanded given the Sanu trade.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 849942, member: 12283"] To follow up on the Robert Woods idea: The Rams need to recoup some draft capital after trading so much away in the Ramsey deal, among other transactions. They also need to create some cap room, as they will be giving Ramsey a mega contract. Specifically at WR, they've paid Cooks and will certainly want to pay Kupp. Carrying three big veteran contracts at that position at the same time would be a challenge. Josh Reynolds is a pretty solid WR who would likely be able to replace Woods in 11 personnel. And lastly, Everett has begun to emerge as more of a receiving option at tight end. So for all of those reason, I could imagine a willingness on their part to deal Robert Woods. Woods is 27 and has two more years remaining on his deal (basically 9M cap hits for both seasons). He would be a nice fit as a man coverage beater. He can play in the slot, though Kupp has obviously dominated the work there in LA. If they would take a 3rd for him, I do that without question. Or maybe a 3rd and a player (Josh Jackson?). A 2nd would be a harder call, though it wouldn't be surprising at all if that's what they demanded given the Sanu trade. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top