Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 849397" data-attributes="member: 7261">You are correct, the Patriots signing of Sanu makes Gordon expendable, but doesn't necessarily translate into that he wouldn't be a good WR for the Packers.  The Pats are now pretty loaded at WR.  So the question becomes, is Gordon done in NE because they have better talent and/or he doesn't fit into their system or is there an underlying issue with him that isn't publicly known yet?So for me, if the Packers do their due diligence on the guy and he is clean (no outstanding issues), his injury isn't long term and they think he can fit into the locker room as well as what the Packers are doing on offense, he might be worth a relatively cheap contract at no trade cost.  If he doesn't work out, they cut him.  Obviously, other options that the Packers might have plays into it too.  If Gordon checks out, I would rather have him, than sit pat and do nothing at all.  I think he is better than most of the other WR's on our team and he would come at no trade cost and cost very little for the remainder of this year. Further, pull a BB.  If he doesn't fully work out here and we don't want to resign him at the end of the year, take the compensatory plus he gives you.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 787 (members: 0, guests: 787)