Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 848637" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Hurns is an example, but not a good one IMO. He never Played for a HOF level QB. Show me a receiver that was successful with Brady, Brees or the like (comparable to Rodgers) that went to a team with a bottom 5 QB (Miami) and improved because they were “forced” as argued above.</p><p> I agree with that. We don’t know anything for certain.. period do we? About anything for that matter so that’s not a great debate for not going after a #2.</p><p></p><p>But speaking of players options we have to project don’t we? I don’t see anything wrong with a reasonable projection. You can disagree with my projection for a #2 type or think like Ryder and say “Parker hasnt been a good receiver since he entered the league” but his opinion doesn’t eliminate the absolute fact that his stats translated into the Packers Offense would lift it. He doesn’t even need to improve that’s the funny thing. I don’t have to project if he’s be better than our current starting options.</p><p></p><p> As an example, Show me one more current active Packer starter not named Adams that clearly outperforms Parker. That’s rhetorical to make a point because you can’t. I don’t even need to win an argument that he’d be much improved... because he’s already better than any WR starting this Sunday. If he improved? He’d be much better than anyone except Adams.</p><p>Enough of my idea. I’m fine with the debate in Parker enough of him it’s not like he’s my relative! Let’s just assume my guy Parker is completely absurd and an off the wall idea. Who is your choice and what specifically would get him to GB and why would a team want to part ways with your choice? </p><p></p><p></p><p>BS RRyder. He had career lows!!</p><p>Luckily we don’t need to believe that crap! Did you think nobody would look? That’s a total falsehood. Thankfully We have the internet!! James Jones has more yards in his Rookie campaign with 47 catches than he did in Oakland with 73 catches! He lost over 150 yards in production going to Oakland. Then he came back to Rodgers and increased that over 200 yards! You’ve lost credibility with me in that argument because it’s exactly the opposite of what you said about JJ having career highs while at Oakland.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JoneJa04.htm" target="_blank">https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JoneJa04.htm</a></p><p></p><p>You can dislike a player all you want and I respect that. I don’t respect trying to fib to support your claim. btw. Who’s your choice for this thread topic? and specifically what would you give up for said player?? I’m asking because I went back and noticed your reluctance to make a specific player claim.. other than to dissect everyone else’s ideas while being overly critical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 848637, member: 10086"] Hurns is an example, but not a good one IMO. He never Played for a HOF level QB. Show me a receiver that was successful with Brady, Brees or the like (comparable to Rodgers) that went to a team with a bottom 5 QB (Miami) and improved because they were “forced” as argued above. I agree with that. We don’t know anything for certain.. period do we? About anything for that matter so that’s not a great debate for not going after a #2. But speaking of players options we have to project don’t we? I don’t see anything wrong with a reasonable projection. You can disagree with my projection for a #2 type or think like Ryder and say “Parker hasnt been a good receiver since he entered the league” but his opinion doesn’t eliminate the absolute fact that his stats translated into the Packers Offense would lift it. He doesn’t even need to improve that’s the funny thing. I don’t have to project if he’s be better than our current starting options. As an example, Show me one more current active Packer starter not named Adams that clearly outperforms Parker. That’s rhetorical to make a point because you can’t. I don’t even need to win an argument that he’d be much improved... because he’s already better than any WR starting this Sunday. If he improved? He’d be much better than anyone except Adams. Enough of my idea. I’m fine with the debate in Parker enough of him it’s not like he’s my relative! Let’s just assume my guy Parker is completely absurd and an off the wall idea. Who is your choice and what specifically would get him to GB and why would a team want to part ways with your choice? BS RRyder. He had career lows!! Luckily we don’t need to believe that crap! Did you think nobody would look? That’s a total falsehood. Thankfully We have the internet!! James Jones has more yards in his Rookie campaign with 47 catches than he did in Oakland with 73 catches! He lost over 150 yards in production going to Oakland. Then he came back to Rodgers and increased that over 200 yards! You’ve lost credibility with me in that argument because it’s exactly the opposite of what you said about JJ having career highs while at Oakland. [URL]https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JoneJa04.htm[/URL] You can dislike a player all you want and I respect that. I don’t respect trying to fib to support your claim. btw. Who’s your choice for this thread topic? and specifically what would you give up for said player?? I’m asking because I went back and noticed your reluctance to make a specific player claim.. other than to dissect everyone else’s ideas while being overly critical. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
scheeler
sschind
shockerx
yxz1000r
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: DoURant
8 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
22 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Guacamole
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
50 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
58 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top