Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scotland Yard" data-source="post: 847555" data-attributes="member: 5934"><p>I want to be clear that I never said anything positive or negative about Dorsey.</p><p></p><p>My post was just pointing out the contradiction between captainWIMM's two posts. CaptainWIMM mocked the Browns' passing game in response to me wanting Beckham in GB if he were to become available. So, WIMM is basically saying it is foolish to covet Beckham for the Packers because he is not producing in CLE. Fine. But, the very next post WIMM praises Dorsey as doing a "good job", even though Dorsey traded a king's ransom for Beckham in the first place. So, Dorsey gets Beckham for a very high price - "good job." I want Beckham in GB - bad idea. You see the hypocrasy?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, since we're talking about it now, I think you gave a fair opinion and I agree with you about all the moves you mention as being good moves. On the other hand, Dantes' criticizism of Dorsey is accurate, and I agree with him about those negative aspects of Dorsey's decisions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scotland Yard, post: 847555, member: 5934"] I want to be clear that I never said anything positive or negative about Dorsey. My post was just pointing out the contradiction between captainWIMM's two posts. CaptainWIMM mocked the Browns' passing game in response to me wanting Beckham in GB if he were to become available. So, WIMM is basically saying it is foolish to covet Beckham for the Packers because he is not producing in CLE. Fine. But, the very next post WIMM praises Dorsey as doing a "good job", even though Dorsey traded a king's ransom for Beckham in the first place. So, Dorsey gets Beckham for a very high price - "good job." I want Beckham in GB - bad idea. You see the hypocrasy? Anyway, since we're talking about it now, I think you gave a fair opinion and I agree with you about all the moves you mention as being good moves. On the other hand, Dantes' criticizism of Dorsey is accurate, and I agree with him about those negative aspects of Dorsey's decisions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: El Guapo
Today at 12:01 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:10 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top