Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Ravens duds and studs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1086998" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>While there’s no argument we’re coming off a historically bad game and certainly I understand people are ultra sensitive about that part, we have to remember that doesn’t imply the team is going to play the #1 Rushing Offense and see 53 carries or whatever. Not to mention I’d expect we’re reviewing tape and making D adjustments to mitigate previous mistakes. I’d also caution that not every team has the capacity of talent to achieve 300+ yards on the ground or 5+ per carry. Not long ago GB was averaging like 3.7 per carry with 12 games logged. While losing Wyatt hurts, that wasn’t all Devonte Wyatt either.</p><p></p><p>Chicago and Baltimore in particular are 2 of the top 3 Rushing teams in the entire league. Ranked #3 and #1 respectively. It’s unlikely GB sees Baltimore again or Buffalo but if we do we made the SB. All the other great teams are.. well? spectators. We played that pair 3 of the last 4 weeks. That in itself is an anomoly.</p><p>Yet that elite Chicago team rushed 50 times at 4.98 per carry in regulation that’s across a nice sample of 2 contests and even with the help of our fumble and an extra quarter they could barely muster 21.5 per game.</p><p></p><p>More recently, it’s a fact that the GB D stymied Chicago for 8 Quarters and 37 points or 18.5 per game. So while in theory saying Chicago can just run it at 5.5 for 50+ just extrapolates and sounds wonderful, The reality is Chicago went 10 of 27 on 3rd down. Lost the first contest and should’ve lost the 2nd one. Again I get the frustration over that Baltimore game and I watched it also, it was miserable Chicago does not strike fear in me like what I saw at Baltimore, because I just watched them 2X.</p><p></p><p>You can’t fumble to the opponent at the 2 min mark. That gave Chicago TWO more possessions and that’s what lost that game. It wasn’t the 5.0 per that lost those meetings. It was the turnover and GB OFFENSE scoring an awful 16 points after moving up n down the field. 1 more O TD and it’s </p><p>2-0 and 5-0 in the Division and this entire conversation goes away.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1086998, member: 10086"] While there’s no argument we’re coming off a historically bad game and certainly I understand people are ultra sensitive about that part, we have to remember that doesn’t imply the team is going to play the #1 Rushing Offense and see 53 carries or whatever. Not to mention I’d expect we’re reviewing tape and making D adjustments to mitigate previous mistakes. I’d also caution that not every team has the capacity of talent to achieve 300+ yards on the ground or 5+ per carry. Not long ago GB was averaging like 3.7 per carry with 12 games logged. While losing Wyatt hurts, that wasn’t all Devonte Wyatt either. Chicago and Baltimore in particular are 2 of the top 3 Rushing teams in the entire league. Ranked #3 and #1 respectively. It’s unlikely GB sees Baltimore again or Buffalo but if we do we made the SB. All the other great teams are.. well? spectators. We played that pair 3 of the last 4 weeks. That in itself is an anomoly. Yet that elite Chicago team rushed 50 times at 4.98 per carry in regulation that’s across a nice sample of 2 contests and even with the help of our fumble and an extra quarter they could barely muster 21.5 per game. More recently, it’s a fact that the GB D stymied Chicago for 8 Quarters and 37 points or 18.5 per game. So while in theory saying Chicago can just run it at 5.5 for 50+ just extrapolates and sounds wonderful, The reality is Chicago went 10 of 27 on 3rd down. Lost the first contest and should’ve lost the 2nd one. Again I get the frustration over that Baltimore game and I watched it also, it was miserable Chicago does not strike fear in me like what I saw at Baltimore, because I just watched them 2X. You can’t fumble to the opponent at the 2 min mark. That gave Chicago TWO more possessions and that’s what lost that game. It wasn’t the 5.0 per that lost those meetings. It was the turnover and GB OFFENSE scoring an awful 16 points after moving up n down the field. 1 more O TD and it’s 2-0 and 5-0 in the Division and this entire conversation goes away. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
27 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 2:15 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 1:29 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Ravens duds and studs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
