Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1036746" data-attributes="member: 10086">I just 100% disagree with that philosophy. I think pipelining multiple selections is a better philosophy and it’s obviously worked much better also for us.This isn't personal, but it’s like you’re banking on a Punter to save the Day across Day3.  Here’s just one of several similar takes on Tory Taylor (5.90 NFL draft grade) So it’s not just me either. He was a consensus 5th Round prospect reached on in Rd4.(f/ BNBFOOTBALL)While the leg strength is great for Taylor, who averaged over 45 yards per punt, he needs much better placement and still needs to prove he can avoid touchbacks. 19 touchbacks over the past two years is by far the most in CFB over that stretch, and that won’t fly in the NFL.Now I understand standing pat in Rd1 though with Caleb and Odunze.  Past that You’ll suffer when you rely on just 3 players across 6 Rounds to fill holes that constantly pop up. Dismissing that after Chicago had a lackluster 2023 draft (in retrospect) should be a relative concern imo.Btw. The Packers drafted 10 players to your 3 players in RDs 2,3,4,5,6,7. Relying on a Punter to save the Day across Day3 tells me all I need to know.</blockquote>

Total: 511 (members: 2, guests: 509)