Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Possible cap casualties in 2017
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreenBaySlacker" data-source="post: 666233" data-attributes="member: 9780"><p>I have been critical of Bahk, and his value to GB currently, vs. the market value for LT. And right now GB will have to overpay for his contributions on the field. But to be fair, I think in a few short years he will evolve into a much better LT. Worthy of protecting Rodgers blind side when he needs it most. THAT, imo is when he should get his big payday. Next contract....... Besides, we already lived through the toughest years of Bahks development. We cant let him go, and start from scratch with another rookie. We should stay the course...</p><p>But all things considered. With Rodgers getting older. TTs history at drafting LTs. With the value of LTs going up. With the "rookie mistakes" hopefully behind him... And the investment into Rodgers blind side 3 years from now, when we need a corner stone at LT....... I think letting the guards go, and overpaying for Bahk is a must. </p><p></p><p>Which is why I love the Spriggs pick. I read HardRightEdge post one time early before the draft mention that Spriggs used to play TE and grew into the OT he is today. A couple months before that I went off about a two TE set with 300 pound (OTs) posing as TEs. As long as they can post up, and catch a dump off if the play breaks down..... yadda yadda yadda. More realistic version is to draft a player like Spriggs, and as a rookie, before we lose Bahk and the guards. TEST out this with our offense... Helps Bahk, helps Rodgers with more time to help our WRs who were struggling. And give a struggling Lacy another blocker on the left side. Bahk isnt a good run blocker. Spriggs at TE would make our left side dominant. The good far out weighs the bad IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreenBaySlacker, post: 666233, member: 9780"] I have been critical of Bahk, and his value to GB currently, vs. the market value for LT. And right now GB will have to overpay for his contributions on the field. But to be fair, I think in a few short years he will evolve into a much better LT. Worthy of protecting Rodgers blind side when he needs it most. THAT, imo is when he should get his big payday. Next contract....... Besides, we already lived through the toughest years of Bahks development. We cant let him go, and start from scratch with another rookie. We should stay the course... But all things considered. With Rodgers getting older. TTs history at drafting LTs. With the value of LTs going up. With the "rookie mistakes" hopefully behind him... And the investment into Rodgers blind side 3 years from now, when we need a corner stone at LT....... I think letting the guards go, and overpaying for Bahk is a must. Which is why I love the Spriggs pick. I read HardRightEdge post one time early before the draft mention that Spriggs used to play TE and grew into the OT he is today. A couple months before that I went off about a two TE set with 300 pound (OTs) posing as TEs. As long as they can post up, and catch a dump off if the play breaks down..... yadda yadda yadda. More realistic version is to draft a player like Spriggs, and as a rookie, before we lose Bahk and the guards. TEST out this with our offense... Helps Bahk, helps Rodgers with more time to help our WRs who were struggling. And give a struggling Lacy another blocker on the left side. Bahk isnt a good run blocker. Spriggs at TE would make our left side dominant. The good far out weighs the bad IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
G
griffin
Administrator
Members online
gopkrs
Packer Fan in SD
GreenBaySlacker
DoURant
sschind
griffin
Latest posts
G
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: DoURant
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
19 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
36 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: DoURant
45 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Possible cap casualties in 2017
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top