Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Playmakers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="warhawk" data-source="post: 132594" data-attributes="member: 431"><p>How far we go to replace Manuel will depend on what they think of Underwood. If they really like what they have there I doubt they will go big and move on a Hamlin or other costly safeties. It will be interesting what they do there. I will say though if we could get a guy that would have an impact even close to what Sanders has done for Indy back there and we would have a top 5 defense. Top 10 for sure. </p><p></p><p>Between Martin and Holliday I like Holliday in the long run. He looks faster and runs good routes. </p><p></p><p>I think we could be fine at WR if we don't latch onto a big name as long as the TE is a true threat and we get that running game humming. More consistancy there along with a break away threat will do more to open up our offense than any #3 we could get our hands on. </p><p></p><p>Inconsistancy there cost us big time in the red zone and especially inside the five. You have to have an effective running game to keep the defense honest down there. The field gets way to small and easy to cover if you don't. </p><p></p><p>Like I said New Orleans has the patent on this. They get two threats behind the QB that can do damage at any time and all of a sudden everybody they have is a playmaker now that they have the QB to get them the ball.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="warhawk, post: 132594, member: 431"] How far we go to replace Manuel will depend on what they think of Underwood. If they really like what they have there I doubt they will go big and move on a Hamlin or other costly safeties. It will be interesting what they do there. I will say though if we could get a guy that would have an impact even close to what Sanders has done for Indy back there and we would have a top 5 defense. Top 10 for sure. Between Martin and Holliday I like Holliday in the long run. He looks faster and runs good routes. I think we could be fine at WR if we don't latch onto a big name as long as the TE is a true threat and we get that running game humming. More consistancy there along with a break away threat will do more to open up our offense than any #3 we could get our hands on. Inconsistancy there cost us big time in the red zone and especially inside the five. You have to have an effective running game to keep the defense honest down there. The field gets way to small and easy to cover if you don't. Like I said New Orleans has the patent on this. They get two threats behind the QB that can do damage at any time and all of a sudden everybody they have is a playmaker now that they have the QB to get them the ball. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Ebonypete
milani
Latest posts
Free Agency Thread
Latest: milani
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Clusters
Latest: Dantés
17 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 schedule
Latest: PikeBadger
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: PikeBadger
49 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:48 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Playmakers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top