Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 963849" data-attributes="member: 5830">Not using a 1st round pick is all that it's about to some people, and they are flat out wrong. That was my point.If you want to take it in a different direction that's fine. I agree with you that there is an argument to be made about resources, but we know what a team without defense looks like in the playoffs. The Packers have been trying for many years to fix that deficiency. We can all argue about it in circles, but a team has to devote its resources across eleven or so position groups each season, with generally only 7 draft picks. This goes back to our discussion in the other thread. You strive for balance knowing full well that you will end up deficient in some position groups and stacked in others, just based on how players pan out and many other factors. I think that the Packers have drafted and acquired players that they thought would work at WR. Right now it appears to be a deficient group. We will see. They have had tremendous success picking mid-round WRs to provide Rodgers with weapons. Lately it hasn't worked. You are a genius when things work and a bum when they fail.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 100 (members: 0, guests: 100)