Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hauschild" data-source="post: 254019" data-attributes="member: 1638">Weak argument because we are all aware of how Brett has no problem sacrificing his body for the betterment of his club.  If he makes cut blocks on linebackers and cornerbacks and lineman - which is MUCH more dangerous, physically than a tackle - what is wrong with making a simple grab-the-legs-and-pull-down tackle???  I don't think I've ever seen a player injure himself making a tackle coming from behind; the guy being tackled, yeah sometimes, but the tackler has the advantage of preparing accordingly.  Remember Big Ben against the Colts a few years back?  He had the stones to atone for his mistake and it ended up enabling Pittsburgh to win that game and then the Super Bowl.Favre chose to Sally-boy his way thru that play and the fumble cost his team at least 3 points.  The failure to tackle cost his team an additional 7.  That's a swing of at LEAST 10 points.Favre's pick cost his team at LEAST 3 points and cost his team another 7 - again, another swing of at LEAST 10 points.So, Favre was directly responsible for at LEAST 20 points that either Minnesota didn't score and Pittsburgh did.  That ain't good.</blockquote>

Total: 750 (members: 3, guests: 747)