Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 626232" data-attributes="member: 4300">• IMO illegal contact caused Rodgers to hold the ball too long. Without the illegal conduct of the D, no fumble. There’s a reason that contact is illegal and it rendered that play null and void and it only shows up in the stats as a penalty for a reason.• With regard to the “easy” passes, what I was referring to was Rodgers’ quick release – that happens after the snap and before the whistle. And it can be measured.• Rodgers caused the snap to happen on plays in which the Chiefs were drawn off sides and when one of their players was late getting to the sideline. There’s no question who caused those penalties on the Chiefs. And the effect of that cause happened within a second of the ball being snapped. That’s post-snap and easily quantifiable.Your justification for their grading system seems to be ‘that’s the way they do it, they’re consistent and they admit it’s a blind spot’. The first two certainly don’t inoculate them from criticism. IMO the criteria they’re using as noted above is bad so being consistently bad obviously isn’t a plus for them. However, I do completely agree with the third point. What they call intangibles is a HUGE part of playing QB. Purposely failing to incorporate them renders their QB grades of very little value IMO.</blockquote>

Total: 76 (members: 4, guests: 72)