Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
PFF gives Rodgers a negative grade against Chiefs last night
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 625787" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>If you read the article it makes sense, especially when they admit that part of Rodger's biggest plus, his pre-snap reads and intangibles, aren't taken into account. All PFF tries to do is rate the play on the field. It's how come they were much lower on Andrew Luck than pretty much everyone else for so long (something that looks prescient now). Rodgers got lucky on two potential turnovers. One of the things PFF tries to do is remove the element of luck. Why shouldn't a QB get a negative mark if they throw a pass that should have been a pick? They also mention that the TD passes to Cobb weren't exactly difficult throws by NFL standards. How exactly is that inaccurate? Explain to me the difficulty in throwing those passes for the average NFL QB. Cobb got a huge amount of credit because he did all of the work on those plays.</p><p></p><p>People should also notice that Rodgers is one of the highest rated QBs by PFF over the years, so taking one game out of context (not actually reading the article) doesn't do much to discredit the system. It only proves that PFF should be one factor in analyzing players, not the only factor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 625787, member: 9033"] If you read the article it makes sense, especially when they admit that part of Rodger's biggest plus, his pre-snap reads and intangibles, aren't taken into account. All PFF tries to do is rate the play on the field. It's how come they were much lower on Andrew Luck than pretty much everyone else for so long (something that looks prescient now). Rodgers got lucky on two potential turnovers. One of the things PFF tries to do is remove the element of luck. Why shouldn't a QB get a negative mark if they throw a pass that should have been a pick? They also mention that the TD passes to Cobb weren't exactly difficult throws by NFL standards. How exactly is that inaccurate? Explain to me the difficulty in throwing those passes for the average NFL QB. Cobb got a huge amount of credit because he did all of the work on those plays. People should also notice that Rodgers is one of the highest rated QBs by PFF over the years, so taking one game out of context (not actually reading the article) doesn't do much to discredit the system. It only proves that PFF should be one factor in analyzing players, not the only factor. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Team Ronny
Heyjoe4
Latest posts
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
16 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Draft-- Media Stuff
Latest: Thirteen Below
21 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Salary Cap as related to Free Agency
Latest: DoURant
Today at 2:03 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Draft Gambling
Latest: sschind
Today at 1:40 PM
Draft Talk
S
Final Annoying Mock/Prediction
Latest: sschind
Today at 1:32 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
PFF gives Rodgers a negative grade against Chiefs last night
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top