Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Peter King mentions in this round table discussion that Cobb will stay in GB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 600844" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>I think it's realistic to think Adams and another player can replace close to the 1,700 yards that Cobb and Adams accounted for last year, maybe even match it. If the Packers really like Rodgers at TE then his production should go up. If the Packers get a third-down back, then his yards would go up. Sign a free agent receiver like Danarius Moore and the Packers could probably run the offense without seeing too much of a drop-off. I'm not against signing Cobb (infact I'd like to see him back) but does it make sense to spend over $18m a year on two receivers when you have the best QB in the game and one of the top running backs? Especially when one of those receivers plays a receiver position that's generally pretty easy to replace. Only so many passes to go around on offense. If the coaches like Adams and want his role to increase then maybe the fron office feels like the $9m per year could be spent elsewhere.</p><p> </p><p>Again, I would like to see the Packers bring Cobb back, but it's far from a certainty that the offense will collapse without him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 600844, member: 9033"] I think it's realistic to think Adams and another player can replace close to the 1,700 yards that Cobb and Adams accounted for last year, maybe even match it. If the Packers really like Rodgers at TE then his production should go up. If the Packers get a third-down back, then his yards would go up. Sign a free agent receiver like Danarius Moore and the Packers could probably run the offense without seeing too much of a drop-off. I'm not against signing Cobb (infact I'd like to see him back) but does it make sense to spend over $18m a year on two receivers when you have the best QB in the game and one of the top running backs? Especially when one of those receivers plays a receiver position that's generally pretty easy to replace. Only so many passes to go around on offense. If the coaches like Adams and want his role to increase then maybe the fron office feels like the $9m per year could be spent elsewhere. Again, I would like to see the Packers bring Cobb back, but it's far from a certainty that the offense will collapse without him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
PackerDNA
yxz1000r
Latest posts
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: milani
Today at 4:22 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:13 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
U
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: U.P. Packfan
Today at 1:31 AM
Draft Talk
2024 Draft-- Media Stuff
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 11:23 PM
Draft Talk
F
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: Firethorn1001
Yesterday at 10:39 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Peter King mentions in this round table discussion that Cobb will stay in GB
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top