Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Personnel Formations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 874287" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>2018 adds up to 98%, not 90%. 2019 adds up to 100%. I did not include the the other 2% of snaps from 2018 because they're negligible amounts spread across seven rarely used formations:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">5 snaps in 20 personnel</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">2 snaps in 01 personnel</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">1 snap in 23 personnel</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">1 snap in 00 personnel</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">1 snap in 31 personnel</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">1 snap in 02 personnel</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">7 snaps in 14 personnel</li> </ul><p>If you feel it's important to know, LaFleur's offense had 12 snaps unaccounted for above that were spread out across 10, 20, 23, 32, and 31 personnel.</p><p></p><p>As I said in the original post:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So I'm not sure why there was this lengthy rebuttal of something I'm not suggesting. I agree that the Packers should have acquired a WR-- especially one that can create yards after the catch. I would not expect them to just ignore the position into the future. This formational shift, if it continues, will affect how many capable receivers you need, but it won't change the importance of the ones who play.</p><p></p><p>The existence of sacks and QB scrambles that turn into rushing attempts don't change the clear shift in year one of LaFleur's offense away from 3 WR sets and towards 2, and even 1 WR sets. Nor does it change the clear shift away from McCarthy's absurdly imbalanced offense towards one that is closer to even between run and pass. The approach in the draft and the current model for what this offense can look like, suggest that the shift will continue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 874287, member: 12283"] 2018 adds up to 98%, not 90%. 2019 adds up to 100%. I did not include the the other 2% of snaps from 2018 because they're negligible amounts spread across seven rarely used formations: [LIST] [*]5 snaps in 20 personnel [*]2 snaps in 01 personnel [*]1 snap in 23 personnel [*]1 snap in 00 personnel [*]1 snap in 31 personnel [*]1 snap in 02 personnel [*]7 snaps in 14 personnel [/LIST] If you feel it's important to know, LaFleur's offense had 12 snaps unaccounted for above that were spread out across 10, 20, 23, 32, and 31 personnel. As I said in the original post: So I'm not sure why there was this lengthy rebuttal of something I'm not suggesting. I agree that the Packers should have acquired a WR-- especially one that can create yards after the catch. I would not expect them to just ignore the position into the future. This formational shift, if it continues, will affect how many capable receivers you need, but it won't change the importance of the ones who play. The existence of sacks and QB scrambles that turn into rushing attempts don't change the clear shift in year one of LaFleur's offense away from 3 WR sets and towards 2, and even 1 WR sets. Nor does it change the clear shift away from McCarthy's absurdly imbalanced offense towards one that is closer to even between run and pass. The approach in the draft and the current model for what this offense can look like, suggest that the shift will continue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
47 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: AKCheese
54 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
Today at 12:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Personnel Formations
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top