Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Perry gets fined for hit on Luck
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DevilDon" data-source="post: 468935" data-attributes="member: 2057"><p>Hey, thanks for standing up for my rights. I don't need it, I know my rights but I appreciate you acknowledge them.</p><p>No, I"m not going to read the rules again. He didn't lead with his crown, it was an incidental hit. Did you get Kevin Greene's reaction? He said "accidents happen" it's a collision game. People run into each other.</p><p>You know what Guapo? I don't really care one iota if you are okay with it. I'm not and yes, I'm deciding to take an opposing view. The day will come when this game is reduced to flag football status and it will be the likes of you that will bring it to that. It's watered down enough don't you think?</p><p>I'm not going to read the official rules. You're one of those people who likes to skirt the intent of a rule aren't you? You like to twist words in a rule to circumvent the word versus the intent or application of the rule.</p><p>It's already been established that the NFL does resort to extraordinary measures when protecting rulings on the field. I suppose you are an NFL apologist in explaining by the letter of the rules and so on while the rest of the NFL fanbase agrees (outside Seattle and Indianapolis) that the Packers got jobbed.</p><p>Can someone please put up a poll? Nevermind, Guapo will reject it on the basis of it's wording.</p><p>So while you become an expert in supposing rulings in NFL games I've been advancing my knowledge of CARC coatings. Your supposition that it's a failed argument is based on your premise that your interpretation of the rules is correct and that further.... your interpretation matches the NFL's and supports your premise. But I don't agree and so it's a flawed premise. An official ruling, you know, after someone who actually practices law might tell us more. It seems Perry is going to appeal. What will you say once his appeal is upheld?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DevilDon, post: 468935, member: 2057"] Hey, thanks for standing up for my rights. I don't need it, I know my rights but I appreciate you acknowledge them. No, I"m not going to read the rules again. He didn't lead with his crown, it was an incidental hit. Did you get Kevin Greene's reaction? He said "accidents happen" it's a collision game. People run into each other. You know what Guapo? I don't really care one iota if you are okay with it. I'm not and yes, I'm deciding to take an opposing view. The day will come when this game is reduced to flag football status and it will be the likes of you that will bring it to that. It's watered down enough don't you think? I'm not going to read the official rules. You're one of those people who likes to skirt the intent of a rule aren't you? You like to twist words in a rule to circumvent the word versus the intent or application of the rule. It's already been established that the NFL does resort to extraordinary measures when protecting rulings on the field. I suppose you are an NFL apologist in explaining by the letter of the rules and so on while the rest of the NFL fanbase agrees (outside Seattle and Indianapolis) that the Packers got jobbed. Can someone please put up a poll? Nevermind, Guapo will reject it on the basis of it's wording. So while you become an expert in supposing rulings in NFL games I've been advancing my knowledge of CARC coatings. Your supposition that it's a failed argument is based on your premise that your interpretation of the rules is correct and that further.... your interpretation matches the NFL's and supports your premise. But I don't agree and so it's a flawed premise. An official ruling, you know, after someone who actually practices law might tell us more. It seems Perry is going to appeal. What will you say once his appeal is upheld? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Off Season News
Latest: milani
Sunday at 2:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Perry gets fined for hit on Luck
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
