Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pass Rushing Stats Need Context
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 771390" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>While I also think it's unlikely we trade back because so far the MO of Gutekunst has been to be aggressive, which would make one think he'll move up.</p><p></p><p>I can see one scenario where this could be a worthy gamble. If one of the top 3-4 QBs slip to #14 (or what they deem as such) Both the Chargers and Arizona have QB needs in their shirt pocket and the Chargers might be very interested in moving ahead of Arizona who's pick at #15 is scheduled to be a QB on many mocks. Especially if GB makes it very affordable to make this happen and we would be doing itself a favor to take away one of Arizona's top needs (our previous playoff nemesis).</p><p>We would only need to be concerned with 2 teams behind us if no one moves position beforehand, that's Arizona and the Ravens before our pick at #17. Many sites have the Ravens top 3 needs as WR, OT and RB, all of which can be bypassed by GB round one. So if GB has at least 2-3 players they deem pretty equal as far as value and need that are still available? The Ravens would likely only take 1 of them and there is a possibility our primary target never even comes off the board!</p><p>The Trade: Pick #14 for #17,#87 (Chargers 1st,3rd)</p><p></p><p> Then we leverage up and use #45 and #87 as a power move to get into the #31-#33 range (New England to Cleveland) I believe there will be some substantial talent that slides to the back of day 1 or opening bell of day 2. I'm sure you can already imagine a variety of options at #17 and say.. #31 overall.</p><p>The other plus is we'd still have those 10 picks to trade up substantially where it's not so costly. Then hit rounds 3-4 aggressively by trading a couple of comp picks to move up in a few rounds where we still have a solid chance of getting someone that can contribute their 1st year or at least quality depth players</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 771390, member: 10086"] While I also think it's unlikely we trade back because so far the MO of Gutekunst has been to be aggressive, which would make one think he'll move up. I can see one scenario where this could be a worthy gamble. If one of the top 3-4 QBs slip to #14 (or what they deem as such) Both the Chargers and Arizona have QB needs in their shirt pocket and the Chargers might be very interested in moving ahead of Arizona who's pick at #15 is scheduled to be a QB on many mocks. Especially if GB makes it very affordable to make this happen and we would be doing itself a favor to take away one of Arizona's top needs (our previous playoff nemesis). We would only need to be concerned with 2 teams behind us if no one moves position beforehand, that's Arizona and the Ravens before our pick at #17. Many sites have the Ravens top 3 needs as WR, OT and RB, all of which can be bypassed by GB round one. So if GB has at least 2-3 players they deem pretty equal as far as value and need that are still available? The Ravens would likely only take 1 of them and there is a possibility our primary target never even comes off the board! The Trade: Pick #14 for #17,#87 (Chargers 1st,3rd) Then we leverage up and use #45 and #87 as a power move to get into the #31-#33 range (New England to Cleveland) I believe there will be some substantial talent that slides to the back of day 1 or opening bell of day 2. I'm sure you can already imagine a variety of options at #17 and say.. #31 overall. The other plus is we'd still have those 10 picks to trade up substantially where it's not so costly. Then hit rounds 3-4 aggressively by trading a couple of comp picks to move up in a few rounds where we still have a solid chance of getting someone that can contribute their 1st year or at least quality depth players [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
jetfixer
Firethorn1001
Poppa San
Latest posts
F
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Firethorn1001
11 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: Poppa San
48 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Time to call Brett back from the woodshed....
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 7:11 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 7:00 PM
Draft Talk
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: DoURant
Today at 6:32 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pass Rushing Stats Need Context
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top