Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pass Rushing Stats Need Context
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elcid" data-source="post: 771232" data-attributes="member: 12360"><p>To be fair, from the spot where we are usually picking in the first (32nd BABY WOOOOO) a trade up of 2 spots would cost substantially less. If we were to pick there I too might actually be an advocate of trading up IF a consensus top 10 prospect were to have fallen some. But considering this pick already is the most valuable we have had in a long time, plus considering that a QB run might have some of the top prospects pushed down to us anyway, and considering the cost of moving up may have been somewhat inflated due to recent trades, I'd really advocate trading down more then up given the chance. I completely agree with your statement of staying aggressive in the second or third round though. In order to facilitate that a trade down of a few spots from 14 might be useful too <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Its all about finding the most value at the best place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elcid, post: 771232, member: 12360"] To be fair, from the spot where we are usually picking in the first (32nd BABY WOOOOO) a trade up of 2 spots would cost substantially less. If we were to pick there I too might actually be an advocate of trading up IF a consensus top 10 prospect were to have fallen some. But considering this pick already is the most valuable we have had in a long time, plus considering that a QB run might have some of the top prospects pushed down to us anyway, and considering the cost of moving up may have been somewhat inflated due to recent trades, I'd really advocate trading down more then up given the chance. I completely agree with your statement of staying aggressive in the second or third round though. In order to facilitate that a trade down of a few spots from 14 might be useful too :) Its all about finding the most value at the best place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pass Rushing Stats Need Context
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top