Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 1070109" data-attributes="member: 4199">I'm less concerned about this because a big part of "draft and develop" is being willing to the players who are "just" contributors go.  And letting aging staters go before they crash and burn.Our own 2026 list is rather long, but no super stars (at least not yet.).  Almost everyone on the list has their replacement already drafted.  R. Walker -> Morgan.  Presumably only keeping one of Watson, Doubs, Wicks, Heath.  Jenkins is likely cut due to his increased cap number.  Q. Walker is probably the only guy who isn't assured to stay but is good enough to be worth a second contract.2027 is a much smaller list, with only Reed and Kraft being the big names.  Nixon is as well, but he'll be on the wrong side of 30.  LVN as well, but he could still be 5th year optioned.  And none of that list is a surprise.  We might quibble about who is and is not worth signing to new deals, but I doubt we'd be that far apart.  And more importantly, the list is the list regardless of Parsons.  If they're good and worth it, we sign them.  If they're not, we let them go.</blockquote>

Total: 380 (members: 3, guests: 377)